Author:
Holzgreve F.,Maurer-Grubinger C.,Isaak J.,Kokott P.,Mörl-Kreitschmann M.,Polte L.,Solimann A.,Wessler L.,Filmann N.,van Mark A.,Maltry L.,Groneberg D. A.,Ohlendorf D.
Abstract
AbstractIn the application of range of motion (ROM) tests there is little agreement on the number of repetitions to be measured and the number of preceding warm-up protocols. In stretch training a plateau in ROM gains can be seen after four to five repetitions. With increasing number of repetitions, the gain in ROM is reduced. This study examines the question of whether such an effect occurs in common ROM tests. Twenty-two healthy sport students (10 m/12 f.) with an average age of 25.3 ± 1.94 years (average height 174.1 ± 9.8 cm; weight 66.6 ± 11.3 kg and BMI 21.9 ± 2.0 kg/cm2) volunteered in this study. Each subject performed five ROM tests in a randomized order—measured either via a tape measure or a digital inclinometer: Tape measure was used to evaluate the Fingertip-to-Floor test (FtF) and the Lateral Inclination test (LI). Retroflexion of the trunk modified after Janda (RF), Thomas test (TT) and a Shoulder test modified after Janda (ST) were evaluated with a digital inclinometer. In order to show general acute effects within 20 repetitions we performed ANOVA/Friedman-test with multiple comparisons. A non-linear regression was then performed to identify a plateau formation. Significance level was set at 5%. In seven out of eight ROM tests (five tests in total with three tests measured both left and right sides) significant flexibility gains were observed (FtF: p < 0.001; LI-left/right: p < 0.001/0.001; RF: p = 0.009; ST-left/right: p < 0.001/p = 0.003; TT-left: p < 0.001). A non-linear regression with random effects was successfully applied on FtF, RF, LI-left/right, ST-left and TT-left and thus, indicate a gradual decline in the amount of gained ROM. An acute effect was observed in most ROM tests, which is characterized by a gradual decline of ROM gain. For those tests, we can state that the acute effect described in the stretching literature also applies to the performance of typical ROM tests. Since a non-linear behavior was shown, it is the decision of the practitioner to weigh up between measurement accuracy and expenditure. Researchers and practitioners should consider this when applying ROM assessments to healthy young adults.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Clarkson, H. M. Joint Motion and Function Assessment: A Research-Based Practical Guide (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2005).
2. Shelbourne, K. D. & Klotz, C. What I have learned about the ACL: utilizing a progressive rehabilitation scheme to achieve total knee symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J. Orthopaedic Sci. 11, 318 (2006).
3. Verrall, G. M. et al. Hip joint range of motion restriction precedes athletic chronic groin injury. J. Sci. Med. Sport 10, 463–466 (2007).
4. Glück, S., Hoffmann, U., Schwarz, M. & Wydra, G. Range of motion, traction force and muscle activity in self- and external-regulated stretching. Deutsche ZeitschriftfürSportmedizin 53, 66–71 (2002).
5. Magnusson, S. P., Simonsen, E. B., Aagaard, P. & Kjaer, M. Biomechanical responses to repeated stretches in human hamstring muscle in vivo. Am. J. Sports Med. 24, 622–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659602400510 (1996).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献