Author:
Pandey Sriniwas,Cao Yiding,Dong Yingjun,Kim Minjun,MacLaren Neil G.,Dionne Shelley D.,Yammarino Francis J.,Sayama Hiroki
Abstract
AbstractStudying extreme ideas in routine choices and discussions is of utmost importance to understand the increasing polarization in society. In this study, we focus on understanding the generation and influence of extreme ideas in routine conversations which we label “eccentric” ideas. The eccentricity of any idea is defined as the deviation of that idea from the norm of the social neighborhood. We collected and analyzed data from two sources of different nature: public social media and online experiments in a controlled environment. We compared the popularity of ideas against their eccentricity to understand individuals’ fascination towards eccentricity. We found that more eccentric ideas have a higher probability of getting a greater number of “likes”. Additionally, we demonstrate that the social neighborhood of an individual conceals eccentricity changes in one’s own opinions and facilitates generation of eccentric ideas at a collective level.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Ferrara, E., Wang, W.-Q., Varol, O., Flammini, A. & Galstyan, A. Predicting online extremism, content adopters, and interaction reciprocity. In Social Informatics (eds Spiro, E. & Ahn, Y.-Y.) 22–39 (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_3.
2. Iannaccone, L. R. & Berman, E. Religious extremism: The good, the bad, and the deadly. Public Choice 128, 109–129 (2006).
3. What Makes a Terrorist. (2018).
4. Christmann, K. Preventing Religious Radicalisation and Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence. University of Huddersfield http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/yjb/preventing-violent-extremism-systematic-review.pdf (2012).
5. Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K. & Hobfoll, S. E. A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. J. Conflict Resolut. 53, 363–389 (2009).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献