Abstract
Abstract3D printing technologies such as fused filament fabrication (FFF) offer great opportunities to enable the fabrication of complex geometries without access to a workshop or knowledge of machining. By adding filler materials to the raw filaments used for FFF, the material properties of the plastic can be adapted. With the addition of neutron absorbing particles, filaments can be created that enable 3D printing of neutron shielding with arbitrary geometry. Two materials for FFF are presented with different mixing ratios of hexagonal Boron nitride (h-BN) and Polylactic acid (PLA). BNPLA25 with 25 %wt h-BN and BNPLA35 with 35 %wt h-BN are compared to the commercially available Addbor N25 material. To qualify the applicability of BNPLA25 and BNPLA35 as shielding material for neutron instrumentation, such as neutron imaging, we investigated the overall neutron attenuation, the influence of non-optimized print settings, as well as characterized the incoherent neutron scattering and the microstructure using neutron imaging, and time-of-flight small-angle-neutron-scattering. Finally, the tensile strength of the material was determined in standardized tensile tests. The measured neutron attenuation shows excellent agreement with analytical calculations, thus validating both the material composition and the calculation method. Approximately 6 mm (8 mm) BNPLA35 are needed for $$1\times 10^{-3}$$
1
×
10
-
3
transmission of a cold (thermal) neutron beam. Lack of extrusion due to suboptimal print settings can be compensated by increased thickness, clearly visible defects can be mitigated by 11–18% increase in thickness. Incoherent scattering is shown to be strongly reduced compared to pure PLA. The tensile strength of the material is shown not to be impacted by the h-BN filler. The good agreement between the measured attenuation and calculation, combined with the adoption of safety factor enables the quick and easy development as well as the performance estimation of shielding components. BNPLA is uniquely suited for 3D printing neutron shielding because of the combination of non-abrasive h-BN particles in standard PLA, which results in a filament that can be printed with almost any off-the-shelf printer and virtually no prior experience in 3D printing. This mitigates the slightly lower attenuation observed as compared to filaments containing $${\hbox {B}_{4}}\hbox {C}$$
B
4
C
, which is highly abrasive and requires extensive additive manufacturing experience.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Genchi, G., Sinicropi, M. S., Lauria, G., Carocci, A. & Catalano, A. The effects of cadmium toxicity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113782 (2020).
2. Rusev, G. et al. Cascade $$\gamma$$ rays following capture of thermal neutrons on $${}^{113}$$cd. Phys. Rev. C 88, 057602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.057602 (2013).
3. Wöhleke. Flexible neutron- and X-Ray shielding. https://www.woehleke.de/wp-content/uploads/Strahlenschutz-Flyer-EN-web.pdf (2023). Accessed: 2023-05-02.
4. PROFILAN Kunststoffwerk GmbH & Co. KG. PROlen 500 BOR5. https://profilan.de/werkstoffe/prolen-500-bor5 (2023). Accessed: 2023-05-02.
5. Additive Composite. Addbor N25 Research and Development. https://additivecomposite.com/research-development (2020). Accessed: 2023-01-30.