Author:
Requia Weeberb J.,Castelhano Francisco Jablinski
Abstract
AbstractSeveral studies have quantified the air pollution exposure disparities across racial and income groups. However, there is still a lack of investigations assessing disparities related to the impacts of weather on air pollution, which could indicate target air pollution reduction strategies under different climate scenarios. Our study aims to address this gap by estimating the economic and racial disparities of the weather impact on air quality in Brazil between 2003 and 2018. First, we used a generalized additive approach to estimate the weather-related changes in PM2.5. This framework derived “weather penalty”, which a positive penalty suggests that an increase in PM2.5 was associated with long-term weather changes in the study period. Then, we estimated the population-weighted weather penalty for racial and income groups. Average penalty for the White population (the most-exposed group) was 31% higher than that of the Pardo population (the least-exposed group, mainly people of light brown skin color) in Brazil. In the stratification analysis by region, the Midwest and South were the regions where the black population was the most-exposed group. For the income group, our results indicate that the high-income population group was the most-exposed group in all analyses, including the national and the regional analyses. These findings are somewhat surprising, as previous studies have shown that minority and low-income populations tend to be more exposed to air pollution, than white and higher-income populations. However, our study suggests that disparities in exposure to air pollution may be more complex and nuanced than previously thought. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying drivers of these environmental disparities, and to develop targeted interventions to reduce exposures.
Funder
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. WHO. Air pollution (2022). https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1.
2. Cohen, A. J. et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the Global burden of diseases study 2015. Lancet 6736, 1–12 (2017).
3. Yazdi, M. D. et al. Long-term effect of exposure to lower concentrations of air pollution on mortality among US Medicare participants and vulnerable subgroups: A doubly-robust approach. Lancet Planet Health 5, e689–e697 (2021).
4. Jhun, I., Coull, B., Zanobetti, A. & Koutrakis, P. The impact of nitrogen oxides concentration decreases on ozone trends in the USA. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 8, 283–292 (2015).
5. Tai, A. P. K., Mickley, L. J. & Jacob, D. J. Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: Implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change. Atmos. Environ. 44, 3976–3984 (2010).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献