Author:
Garg Ankit,Bordoloi Sanandam,Ganesan Suriya Prakash,Sekharan Sreedeep,Sahoo Lingaraj
Abstract
AbstractPermanent wilting point (PWP) is generally used to ascertain plant resistance against abiotic drought stress and designated as the soil water content (θ) corresponding to soil suction (ψ) at 1500 kPa obtained from the soil water retention curve. Determination of PWP based on only pre-assumed ψ may not represent true wilting condition for soils with contrasting water retention abilities. In addition to ψ, there is a need to explore significance of additional plant parameters (i.e., stomatal conductance and photosynthetic status) in determining PWP. This study introduces a new framework for determining PWP by integrating plant leaf response and ψ during drought. Axonopus compressus were grown in two distinct textured soils (clayey loam and silty sand), after which drought was initiated till wilting. Thereafter, ψ and θ within the root zone were measured along with corresponding leaf stomatal conductance and photosynthetic status. It was found that coarse textured silty sand causes wilting at much lower ψ (≈ 300 kPa) than clayey loam (≈ 1600 kPa). Plant response to drought was dependent on the relative porosity and mineralogy of the soil, which governs the ease at which roots can grow, assimilate soil O2, and uptake water. For clay loam, the held water within the soil matrix does not facilitate easy root water uptake by relatively coarse root morphology. Contrastingly, fine root hair formation in silty sand facilitated higher plant water uptake and doubled the plant survival time.
Funder
National Natural Science Fund (NSFC) grant
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Althor, G., Watson, J. E. & Fuller, R. A. Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Sci. Rep. 6, 20281 (2016).
2. Sultan, B., Defrance, D. & Iizumi, T. Evidence of crop production losses in West Africa due to historical global warming in two crop models. Sci. Rep. 9, 12834 (2019).
3. Change, I. P. O. C. Intergovernmental panel on climate (Climate change, 2014)
4. Karmakar, R., Das, I., Dutta, D. & Rakshit, A. Potential effects of climate change on soil properties: a review. Sci. Intern. 4, 51–73 (2016).
5. Pandey, P., Irulappan, V. M., Bagavathiannan, M. & Muthappa, S. K. Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 537 (2017).
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献