Sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder using the InterStim and BetterStim systems

Abstract

AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate differences in the clinical outcomes of different sacral neuromodulation systems (InterStim and BetterStim) used in the treatment of overactive bladder. Data from a previously established database of sacral neuromodulation in China (the InterStim system) and a 2020 clinical trial of the BetterStim system were screened. Patients with overactive bladder undergoing stage II implanted pulse generator implantation were selected for analysis and divided into InterStim and BetterStim system groups. Voiding diaries and subjective scores obtained preoperatively, after stage I tined-lead implantation (experience period), and after stage II implanted pulse generator implantation were compared between the two groups. This study included 113 patients with overactive bladder (43, InterStim system group; 70, BetterStim system group). Voiding diaries and subjective scores significantly improved in both the InterStim and BetterStim system groups over the treatment period. Specifically, the urination frequency (all P < 0.001), average voiding volume (all P < 0.001), and average urinary leakage (InterStim, P < 0.05; BetterStim, P < 0.01) in both groups significantly improved at different periods during treatment. At the same time, the urgency perception scale (P < 0.001) and OAB-related quality of life score (InterStim, P < 0.05; BetterStim, P < 0.01) also significantly improved. There was no significant difference in urination frequency at baseline between the two groups (P = 0.169). Urination frequency was significantly higher in the BetterStim system group than in the InterStim group during the experience period and at follow-up (P = 0.031, P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the number of urinary leakages between the different systems at baseline (P = 0.662), although this was higher in the InterStim system group during the experience period (P = 0.016), and the difference disappeared at the last follow-up (P = 0.565). There were significant differences in baseline urgency perception scale (P = 0.001) and OAB-related quality of life score (P < 0.001) between the two groups; however, these differences were not maintained at follow-up (P = 0.81, P = 0.479). Both sacral neuromodulation systems are safe and effective in treating overactive bladder. The InterStim system may be more beneficial for patients with dry overactive bladder. Satisfactory outcomes may be achieved with the BetterStim system in patients with wet overactive bladder. However, further studies are required to confirm this finding.