Author:
Manoni Michele,Altomare Alessandra,Nonnis Simona,Ferrario Giulio,Mazzoleni Sharon,Tretola Marco,Bee Giuseppe,Tedeschi Gabriella,Aldini Giancarlo,Pinotti Luciano
Abstract
AbstractReplacing cereals with food leftovers could reduce feed-food competition and keep nutrients and energy in the food chain. Former food products (FFPs) are industrial food leftovers no more intended for human but still suitable as alternative and sustainable feedstuffs for monogastric. In this study, omics approaches were applied to evaluate the impact of dietary FFPs on pig liver proteome and plasma peptidome. Thirty-six Swiss Large White male castrated pigs were randomly assigned to three dietary treatments [control (CTR), 30% CTR replaced with salty FFP (SA), 30% CTR replaced with sugary FFP (SU)] from the start of the growing phase (22.4 ± 1.7 kg) until slaughtering (110 ± 3 kg). The low number of differentially regulated proteins in each comparison matrix (SA/SU vs. CTR) and the lack of metabolic interaction indicated a marginal impact on hepatic lipid metabolism. The plasma peptidomics investigation showed low variability between the peptidome of the three dietary groups and identified three possible bioactive peptides in the SA group associated with anti-hypertension and vascular homeostasis regulation. To conclude, the limited modulation of liver proteome and plasma peptidome by the SA and SU diets strenghtened the idea of reusing FFPs as feed ingredients to make pig production more sustainable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Pinotti, L. et al. Recycling food leftovers in feed as opportunity to increase the sustainability of livestock production. J. Clean Prod. 294, 126290 (2021).
2. Pinotti, L., Mazzoleni, S., Moradei, A., Lin, P. & Luciano, A. Effects of alternative feed ingredients on red meat quality: A review of algae, insects, agro-industrial by-products and former food products. It. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 695–710 (2023).
3. Govoni, C., Chiarelli, D. D., Luciano, A., Pinotti, L. & Rulli, M. C. Global assessment of land and water resource demand for pork supply. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 074003–074015 (2022).
4. Andretta, I. et al. Environmental impacts of pig and poultry production: Insights from a systematic review. Front. Vet. Sci. 8, 750733 (2021).
5. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the European Commission on theobromine as undesirable substances in animal feed. EFSA J. 725, 1–66 (2008).