Author:
Surowiak Alicja Karolina,Sowała Marta,Talma Michał,Groborz Katarzyna,Balcerzak Lucyna,Lochyński Stanisław,Strub Daniel Jan
Abstract
AbstractDue to market and legislative expectations, there is a constant need to explore new potential antimicrobial agents for functional perfumery. In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 53 low molecular oximes and the corresponding carbonyl compounds against Escherichia coli, Enterococcus hirae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus brasiliensis, Legionella pneumophila and Candida albicans. The most potent compound was α-isomethylionone oxime, which exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 18.75 µg/mL against E. hirae. The evaluation of the MICs for bacterial and fungal strains was performed for selected compounds, for example, the MIC of 2-phenylpropionaldehyde, cis-jasmone oxime, and trans-cinnamaldehyde measured against A. brasiliensis was 37.50 µg/mL. ADME-Tox (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) cell viability assays were performed to assess the cytotoxicity of tested compounds. ADME-Tox indicated the safety and promising properties of selected compounds, which enables their usage as nontoxic supporting antibacterial agents. The results of the in vitro MTS assay were consistent with the ADME-Tox results. None of the compounds tested was toxic to Human Embryonic Kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells, with all cell viabilities exceeding 85%.
Funder
Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Takhar, S. & Liyanage, K. Framework for a chemical substance reporting system. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 3, 459–477. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj030553 (2018).
2. Jeong, S.-H., Jang, J.-H., Cho, H.-Y. & Lee, Y.-B. Risk assessment for humans using physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of diethyl phthalate and its major metabolite, monoethyl phthalate. Arch. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02748-9 (2020).
3. Rastogi, S. C., Rastogi, P. & Mendiratta, N. Bioinformatics Methods and Applications: Genomics Proteomics and Drug Discovery 3rd edn, 43–56 (Prentice-Hall Of India Pvt. Limited, 2008).
4. Tetko, I. V., Bruneau, P., Mewes, H.-W., Rohrer, D. C. & Poda, G. I. Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME–Tox predictions?. Drug Discov. Today 11, 700–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2006.06.013 (2006).
5. Lagorce, D., Bouslama, L., Becot, J., Miteva, M. A. & Villoutreix, B. O. FAF-Drugs4: Free ADME-tox filtering computations for chemical biology and early stages drug discovery. Bioinform 33, 3658–3660. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx491 (2017).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献