Abstract
AbstractThe sensorimotor integration during unconstrained reaching movements in the presence of variable environmental forces remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to quantify how much the primary afferent activity of muscle spindles can contribute to shaping muscle coactivation patterns during reaching movements with complex dynamics. To achieve this objective, we designed a virtual reality task that guided healthy human participants through a set of planar reaching movements with controlled kinematic and dynamic conditions that were accompanied by variable muscle co-contraction. Next, we approximated the Ia afferent activity using a phenomenological model of the muscle spindle and muscle lengths derived from a musculoskeletal model. The parameters of the spindle model were altered systematically to evaluate the effect of fusimotor drive on the shape of the temporal profile of afferent activity during movement. The experimental and simulated data were analyzed with hierarchical clustering. We found that the pattern of co-activation of agonistic and antagonistic muscles changed based on whether passive forces in each movement played assistive or resistive roles in limb dynamics. The reaching task with assistive limb dynamics was associated with the most muscle co-contraction. In contrast, the simulated Ia afferent profiles were not changing between tasks and they were largely reciprocal with homonymous muscle activity. Simulated physiological changes to the fusimotor drive were not sufficient to reproduce muscle co-contraction. These results largely rule out the static set and α-γ coactivation as the main types of fusimotor drive that transform the monosynaptic Ia afferent feedback into task-dependent co-contraction of antagonistic muscles. We speculate that another type of nonlinear transformation of Ia afferent signals that is independent of signals modulating the activity of α motoneurons is required for Ia afferent-based co-contraction. This transformation could either be applied through a complex nonlinear profile of fusimotor drive that is not yet experimentally observed or through presynaptic inhibition.
Funder
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences
West Virginia University
United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference66 articles.
1. Gritsenko, V., Hardesty, R. L., Boots, M. T. & Yakovenko, S. Biomechanical constraints underlying motor primitives derived from the musculoskeletal anatomy of the human arm. PLoS ONE 11, 1–18 (2016).
2. Yakovenko, S. A hierarchical perspective on rhythm generation for locomotor control. Prog. Brain Res. 188, 151–166 (2011).
3. Prochazka, A. & Yakovenko, S. The neuromechanical tuning hypothesis. In Progress in Brain Research (eds Cisek, P. et al.) 255–265 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007).
4. Nishikawa, K. et al. Neuromechanics: An integrative approach for understanding motor control. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 16–54 (2007).
5. Taga, G., Yamaguchi, Y. & Shimizu, H. Self-organized control of bipedal locomotion by neural oscillators in unpredictable environment. Biol. Cybern. 65, 147–159 (1991).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献