Author:
Barcellos Débora Pereira Diniz Correia,Farina Ana Paula,Barcellos Ramiro,Souza Matheus Albino,Borba Márcia,Bedran-Russo Ana Karina,Bello Yuri Dal,Pimenta Vidal Cristina De Mattos,Cecchin Doglas
Abstract
AbstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of glycolic acid (GA) (with pH 1.2 and 5) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the chemical and mechanical properties of dentin to investigate the potential use of GA as final irrigant in the root canal therapy. Specifically, changes in microhardness, smear layer removal, erosion, mineral content distribution, apatite/collagen ratio and flexural strength of mineralized dentin treated with GA were assessed. Saline solution was used as a negative control. Knoop microhardness (KHN) was measured on the root canal lumen of root segments. Dentin beams were used for 3-point flexural strength (σ) test. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of root sections were obtained for evaluation of smear layer removal and dentin erosion on root segments and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used for mineral content distribution. The apatite/collagen ratio (A/C) in dentin powder were examined by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. KHN, σ and A/C results were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Smear layer and dentin erosion scores were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Root dentin treated with EDTA and GA presented similar KHN regardless of the pH (p > 0.05). However, KHN was significantly reduced in EDTA and GA groups when compared to control group (p<0.001). GA showed the same ability to remove the smear layer and to cause dentin erosion as EDTA. EDS results showed that the GA and EDTA solutions did not alter the dentin mineral content distribution. The apatite/collagen ratio reduced with all irrigant solution and was the lowest with GA pH 5 (p<0.001), while σ was not significantly affected by the experimental solutions (p = 0.559). It can be concluded that GA has similar ability to remove the smear layer than EDTA. GA does not affect negatively the chemical/mechanical properties and it does not increase dentin erosion. The use of GA with low pH seems to promote less change in collagen/apatite ratio, but further studies are needed to establish an ideal clinical protocol. Therefore, this study supports the potential use of GA as an alternative final irrigation solution for root canal preparation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Zandi, H. et al. Antibacterial Effectiveness of 2 Root Canal Irrigants in Root-filled Teeth with Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Endod. 42, 1307–1313 (2016).
2. Shahravan, A., Haghdoost, A. A., Adl, A., Rahimi, H. & Shadifar, F. Effect of Smear Layer on Sealing Ability of Canal Obturation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Endod. 33, 96–105 (2007).
3. Zehnder, M. Root Canal Irrigants. Journal of Endodontics 32, 389–398 (2006).
4. Garberoglio, R. & Becce, C. Smear layer removal by root canal irrigants. A comparative scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surgery, Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 78, 359–367 (1994).
5. Panighi, M. & G’Sell, C. Influence of calcium concentration on the dentin wettability by an adhesive. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 11, 2 (1992).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献