Author:
Zhang Ye,Ding Rong,Frassinelli Diego,Tuomainen Jyrki,Klavinskis-Whiting Sebastian,Vigliocco Gabriella
Abstract
AbstractIn face-to-face communication, multimodal cues such as prosody, gestures, and mouth movements can play a crucial role in language processing. While several studies have addressed how these cues contribute to native (L1) language processing, their impact on non-native (L2) comprehension is largely unknown. Comprehension of naturalistic language by L2 comprehenders may be supported by the presence of (at least some) multimodal cues, as these provide correlated and convergent information that may aid linguistic processing. However, it is also the case that multimodal cues may be less used by L2 comprehenders because linguistic processing is more demanding than for L1 comprehenders, leaving more limited resources for the processing of multimodal cues. In this study, we investigated how L2 comprehenders use multimodal cues in naturalistic stimuli (while participants watched videos of a speaker), as measured by electrophysiological responses (N400) to words, and whether there are differences between L1 and L2 comprehenders. We found that prosody, gestures, and informative mouth movements each reduced the N400 in L2, indexing easier comprehension. Nevertheless, L2 participants showed weaker effects for each cue compared to L1 comprehenders, with the exception of meaningful gestures and informative mouth movements. These results show that L2 comprehenders focus on specific multimodal cues – meaningful gestures that support meaningful interpretation and mouth movements that enhance the acoustic signal – while using multimodal cues to a lesser extent than L1 comprehenders overall.
Funder
European Research Council
Royal Society
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Cutler, A., Dahan, D. & van Donselaar, W. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Lang. Speech 40, 141–201 (1997).
2. Cole, J. Prosody in context: A review. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 30, 1–31 (2015).
3. Wagner, M. & Watson, D. G. Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Lang. Cogn. Process. 25, 905–945 (2010).
4. McNeill, D. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought (University of Chicago Press, 1992).
5. Hostetter, A. B. When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 137, 297–315 (2011).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献