Author:
Wolf Peter,Moor Roman,Lundberg Arne,Nester Christopher,Arndt Anton,Graf Eveline
Abstract
AbstractKnowledge about the orientation of a representative ankle joint axis is limited to studies of tarsal morphology and of quasistatic movements. The aim of our study was therefore to determine the development of the axis orientation during walking. Intracortical bone pins were used to monitor the kinematics of the talus and tibia of five healthy volunteers. The finite helical axis was determined for moving windows of 10% stance phase and its orientation reported if the rotation about the axis was more than 2°. A representative axis for ankle dorsi- and plantarflexion was also estimated based on tarsal morphology. As reported by literature, the morphology-based axis was inclined more medially upwards for dorsiflexion than for plantarflexion. However, when a mean of the finite helical axis orientations was calculated for each walking trial for dorsiflexion (stance phase 15–25%) and for plantarflexion (stance phase 85–95%), the inclination was less medially upwards in dorsiflexion than in plantarflexion in four out of five participants. Thus, it appears that the inclination of a representative ankle joint axis for dynamic loading situations cannot be estimated from either morphology or quasi-static experiments. Future studies assessing muscle activity, ligament behaviour and articulating surfaces may help to identify the determining factors for the orientation of a representative ankle joint axis.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Karolinska Institute’s Research Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Barnett, C. H. & Napier, J. R. The axis of rotation at the ankle joint in man. Its influence upon the form of the talus and the mobility of the fibula. J. Anat. 86, 1–9 (1952).
2. Inman, V. T. The Joints of the Ankle (Williams and Wilkins, 1976).
3. Nozaki, S., Watanabe, K. & Katayose, M. Three-dimensional analysis of talar trochlea morphology: Implications for subject-specific kinematics of the talocrural joint. Clin. Anat. 29, 1066–1074 (2016).
4. Bottlang, M., Marsh, J. L. & Brown, T. D. Articulated external fixation of the ankle: Minimizing motion resistance by accurate axis alignment. J. Biomech. 32, 63–70 (1999).
5. Hicks, J. H. The mechanics of the foot: I. The joints. J. Anat. 88, 345–357 (1954).