Author:
Luongo Chiara,Llamas-López Pedro José,Garrappa Gabriela,Rodríguez-Tobón Ernesto,Grudzinska Paulina,García-Vázquez Francisco Alberto
Abstract
AbstractBoar ejaculate is composed of sperm cells and seminal plasma (SP) and is emitted in different fractions (pre-sperm fraction; spermatic-rich fraction; intermediate fraction; post-spermatic fraction), with different composition of SP and volume, which could influence the sperm quality during seminal doses preparation, conservation, and interaction with the female reproductive tract. In artificial insemination (AI) centers, seminal doses are usually prepared with the spermatic-rich and intermediate fractions, but the inclusion of other ejaculate fractions, although controversial, is beginning to be applied. The objective was to evaluate the synergic effect of accumulative ejaculated fractions on sperm functionality during seminal doses preparation, throughout storage and after incubation with uterine fluid (UF). For this purpose, a total of 57 ejaculates were collected, and the following experimental groups were prepared (n = 19 per group): (F1) spermatic-rich fraction; (F2) F1 plus intermediate fraction; (F3) F2 plus post-spermatic fraction. Each group was stored for 5 days at ∼16 °C, and the following parameters were evaluated: sperm metabolism of pure and diluted semen (day 1), sperm quality parameters (days 1, 3, 5), thermal-resistance test (TRT) and incubation with uterine fluid (UF) (day 5). Sperm metabolic rates between accumulative ejaculate fractions from pure and diluted semen did not show differences. Also, sperm quality parameters were not affected by the ejaculate fraction during storage. However, sperm subjected to TRT showed similar results except for progressive motility, which was better in F2 and F3 than F1. When sperm were incubated with UF, the quality decreased in each group, but sperm from F2 and F3 were less affected than those from F1. In conclusion, the post-spermatic fraction can be included in seminal doses for their use in AI-centers, with functionality of sperm of different SP origins not being impaired throughout the storage, and responding better to thermal and UF stress. However, further research in AI-centers is necessary to test the sperm behaviour under presented conditions.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Innovation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Knox, R. V. Impact of swine reproductive technologies on pig and global food production. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 752, 131–160 (2014).
2. Bortolozzo, F., Menegat, M., Mellagi, A., Bernardi, M. & Wentz, I. New artificial insemination technologies for swine. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 50, 80–84 (2015).
3. Rodríguez-Martínez, H. State of the art in farm animal sperm evaluation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 19, 91–101 (2007).
4. Luongo, C., Llamas-López, P. J., Hernández-Caravaca, I., Matás, C. & García-Vázquez, F. A. Should all fractions of the boar ejaculate be prepared for insemination rather than using the sperm rich only? Biology (Basel) 11, 425 (2022).
5. López-Rodríguez, A., Van Soom, A., Arsenakis, I. & Maes, D. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Manag. 3, 15 (2017).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献