Author:
Bedder Rachel L.,Vaghi Matilde M.,Dolan Raymond J.,Rutledge Robb B.
Abstract
AbstractHumans exhibit distinct risk preferences when facing choices involving potential gains and losses. These preferences are believed to be subject to neuromodulatory influence, particularly from dopamine and serotonin. As neuromodulators manifest circadian rhythms, this suggests decision making under risk might be affected by time of day. Here, in a large subject sample collected using a smartphone application, we found that risky options with potential losses were increasingly chosen over the course of the day. We observed this result in both a within-subjects design (N = 2599) comparing risky options chosen earlier and later in the day in the same individuals, and in a between-subjects design (N = 26,720) showing our effect generalizes across ages and genders. Using computational modelling, we show this diurnal change in risk preference reflects a decrease in sensitivity to increasing losses, but no change was observed in the relative impacts of gains and losses on choice (i.e., loss aversion). Thus, our findings reveal a striking diurnal modulation in human decision making, a pattern with potential importance for real-life decisions that include voting, medical decisions, and financial investments.
Funder
Medical Research Council
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
National Institute of Mental Health
Human Frontier Science Programme Fellowship
Wellcome Trust
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. Levin, I. P. & Hart, S. S. Risk preferences in young children: Early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 16, 397–413 (2003).
2. Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R. & Betz, N. E. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 15, 263–290 (2002).
3. Yechiam, E. & Ert, E. Risk attitude in decision making: In search of trait-like constructs. Top. Cogn. Sci. 3, 166–186 (2011).
4. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979).
5. Liu, Y.-Y., Nacher, J. C., Ochiai, T., Martino, M. & Altshuler, Y. Prospect theory for online financial trading. PLoS ONE 9, 1–7 (2014).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献