Author:
Schmidt Filipp,Kleis Jasmin,Morgenstern Yaniv,Fleming Roland W.
Abstract
AbstractEstablishing correspondence between objects is fundamental for object constancy, similarity perception and identifying transformations. Previous studies measured point-to-point correspondence between objects before and after rigid and non-rigid shape transformations. However, we can also identify ‘similar parts’ on extremely different objects, such as butterflies and owls or lizards and whales. We measured point-to-point correspondence between such object pairs. In each trial, a dot was placed on the contour of one object, and participants had to place a dot on ‘the corresponding location’ of the other object. Responses show correspondence is established based on similarities between semantic parts (such as head, wings, or legs). We then measured correspondence between ambiguous objects with different labels (e.g., between ‘duck’ and ‘rabbit’ interpretations of the classic ambiguous figure). Despite identical geometries, correspondences were different across the interpretations, based on semantics (e.g., matching ‘Head’ to ‘Head’, ‘Tail’ to ‘Tail’). We present a zero-parameter model based on labeled semantic part data (obtained from a different group of participants) that well explains our data and outperforms an alternative model based on contour curvature. This demonstrates how we establish correspondence between very different objects by evaluating similarity between semantic parts, combining perceptual organization and cognitive processes.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
European Research Council
Projekt DEAL
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R. & Tenenbaum, J. B. One-shot learning by inverting a compositional causal process. Adv. Neural Inf. Process Syst. 26, 2526–2534 (2013).
2. Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R. & Tenenbaum, J. B. Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science 350, 1332–1338. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3050 (2015).
3. Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R. & Perona, P. One-shot learning of object categories. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 594–611. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2006.79 (2006).
4. Biederman, I. Recognition-by-components. A theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94, 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115 (1987).
5. Morgenstern, Y., Schmidt, F. & Fleming, R. W. One-shot categorization of novel object classes in humans. Vis. Res. 165, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.005 (2019).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献