Abstract
AbstractThe experiences of inner harmony and ethical sensitivity among late adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic depend on the interplay of perceptive factors, personal resources and cognitive and stress mechanisms. Using a sample from Poland, the present study examined the relationships between the perceptions of COVID-19 and the Light Triad and the characteristics of inner harmony and ethical sensitivity from the mediational perspective of meaning-making and perceived stress. Three hundred and sixteen late adolescents were recruited in the cross-sectional study. They filled in questionnaires measuring the perception of COVID-19, the Light Triad, meaning-making, stress, inner harmony and ethical sensitivity, from April to September 2020. The perception of COVID-19 was negatively related to ethical sensitivity, whereas the Light Triad was positively related to inner harmony and ethical sensitivity. Perceived stress and meaning-making mediated the relationships between the perceptions of COVID-19, the Light Triad and the characteristic of inner harmony. Perception processes and the Light Triad dimensions directly influence ethical sensitivity, as well as indirectly affect inner harmony through meaning-making processes and perceived stress. This noticeably highlights the vital role played by meaning structures and emotional reactions in the experience of inner peace and calmness.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Cunningham, J. W. et al. Clinical outcomes in young US adults hospitalized with COVID-19. JAMA Intern. Med. 181, 379–381 (2021).
2. Padrosa, E. & Bolíbar, M. Disentangling youth non-compliance with COVID-19 restrictions from gender, socioeconomic vulnerability and poor mental health: Lessons from the first wave in Catalonia. J. Youth Stud. 1–17 (2022).
3. Rogers, C. Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. in Social psychology: A Sourcebook 153–176 (Guilford Press).
4. Babcicky, P. & Seebauer, S. Unpacking protection motivation theory: Evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior. J. Risk Res. 22, 1503–1521 (2019).
5. Plotnikoff, R. C. & Trinh, L. Protection motivation theory: Is this a worthwhile theory for physical activity promotion?. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 38, 91–98 (2010).