Author:
Lopes de Castro Carla,Fundowicz Magdalena,Roselló Alvar,Jové Josep,Deantonio Letizia,Aguiar Artur,Pisani Carla,Villà Salvador,Boladeras Anna,Konstanty Ewelina,Kruszyna-Mochalska Marta,Milecki Piotr,Jurado-Bruggeman Diego,Lencart Joana,Modolell Ignasi,Muñoz-Montplet Carles,Aliste Luisa,Torras Maria Gloria,Puigdemont Montserrat,Carvalho Luísa,Krengli Marco,Guedea Ferran,Malicki Julian
Abstract
AbstractTo assess adherence to standard clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of patients undergoing prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy in four European countries using clinical audits as part of the international IROCA project. Multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of 240 randomly-selected patients treated for PCa (n = 40/centre) in the year 2015 at six European hospitals. Clinical indicators applicable to general and PCa-specific radiotherapy processes were evaluated. All data were obtained directly from medical records. The audits were performed in the year 2017. Adherence to clinical protocols and practices was satisfactory, but with substantial inter-centre variability in numerous variables, as follows: staging MRI (range 27.5–87.5% of cases); presentation to multidisciplinary tumour board (2.5–100%); time elapsed between initial visit to the radiation oncology department and treatment initiation (42–102.5 days); number of treatment interruptions ≥ 1 day (7.5–97.5%). The most common deviation from standard clinical practice was inconsistent data registration, mainly failure to report data related to diagnosis, treatment, and/or adverse events. This clinical audit detected substantial inter-centre variability in adherence to standard clinical practice, most notably inconsistent record keeping. These findings confirm the value of performing clinical audits to detect deviations from standard clinical practices and procedures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献