Author:
Caley Peter,Gladish Daniel W.,Kingham Lloyd,van Klinken Rieks D.
Abstract
AbstractInternational trade in horticultural produce happens under phytosanitary inspection and production protocols. Fruit inspection typically involves the sampling and inspection of either 600-pieces or 2% of packed product within a single consignment destined for export, with the purpose of certification (typically with 95% confidence) that the true infestation level within the consignment in question doesn’t exceed a pre-specified design prevalence. Sampling of multiple consignments from multiple production blocks in conjunction with pre-harvest monitoring for pests can be used to provide additional inference on the prevalence of infested fruit within an overall production system subject to similar protocols. Here we develop a hierarchical Bayesian model that combines in-field monitoring data with consignment sample inspection data to infer the prevalence of infested fruit in a production system. The results illustrate how infestation prevalence is influenced by the number of consignments inspected, the detection efficacy of consignment sampling, and in-field monitoring effort and sensitivity. Uncertainty in inspection performance, monitoring methods, and exposure of fruit to pests is accommodated using statistical priors within a Bayesian modelling framework. We demonstrate that pre-harvest surveillance with a sufficient density of traps and moderate detection sensitivity can provide 95% belief that the prevalence of infestation is below $$1 \times 10^{-6}$$
1
×
10
-
6
. In the absence of pre-harvest monitoring, it is still possible to gain high confidence in a very low prevalence of infestation ($$<1 \times 10^{-5}$$
<
1
×
10
-
5
) on the basis of multiple clean samples if the inspection sensitivity during consignment sampling is high and sufficient consignments are inspected. Our work illustrates the cumulative power of in-field surveillance and consignment sampling to update estimates of infestation prevalence.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. IPPC. ISPM 5: Glossary of phytosanitary terms. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures. (FAO, 2017).
2. IPPC. ISPM 31: Methodologies for sampling of consignments. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures. (FAO, 2016).
3. Trouvè, R., Arthur, A. D. & Robinson, A. P. Assessing the quality of offshore binomial sampling biosecurity inspections using onshore inspections. Ecol. Appl. 32, e2595. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2595 (2022).
4. Schilling, E. G. & Neubauer, D. V. Compliance sampling. In Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017).
5. Trouvè, R. & Robinson, A. P. Estimating consignment-level infestation rates from the proportion of consignment that failed border inspection: Possibilities and limitations in the presence of overdispersed data. Risk Anal. 41, 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13592 (2021).