Abstract
AbstractCancer patients could combine herbal treatments with their chemotherapy. We consulted VigiBase, a WHO database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) which archives reports of suspected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) when herbal products are used in conjunction with anti-cancer treatment. We focused on the possible interactions between antineoplastic (L01 ATC class) or hormone antagonists (L02B ATC class) with 10 commonly used herbs (pineapple, green tea, cannabis, black cohosh, turmeric, echinacea, St John’s wort, milk thistle and ginger) to compare ADRs described in ICSRs with the literature. A total of 1057 ICSRs were extracted from the database but only 134 were complete enough (or did not concern too many therapeutic lines) to keep them for analysis. Finally, 51 rationalizable ICSRs could be explained, which led us to propose a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction mechanism. Reports concerned more frequently women and half of the rationalizable ICSRs involved Viscum album and Silybum marianum. 5% of the ADRs described could have been avoided if clinicians had had access to the published information. It is also important to note that in 8% of the cases, the ADRs observed were life threatening. Phytovigilance should thus be considered more by health care professionals to best treat cancer patients and for better integrative care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference94 articles.
1. Lehmann, H. & Pabst, J.-Y. Phytovigilance: Impératif médical et obligation légale. Ann. Pharm. Fr. 74, 49–60 (2016).
2. UMC | VigiBase. https://www.who-umc.org/vigibase/vigibase/.
3. Lindquist, M. The need for definitions in pharmacovigilance. Drug-Safety 30, 825–830 (2007).
4. Geniaux, H. & Picard, N. Les interactions pharmacocinétiques et pharmacodynamiques. Actual. Pharm. 58, 52–54 (2019).
5. Bailey, D. Stockley’s herbal medicines interactions. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 71, 143 (2011).