Author:
Ivert A.,Holowko N.,Liu X.,Edqvist M.,Roos N.,Gustafson P.,Stephansson O.
Abstract
AbstractTo describe trends and identify maternal and pregnancy predictive risk factors for having a compensated claim for a maternal injury during delivery, as a proxy for having received suboptimal care. This nationwide retrospective cohort study included 1 754 869 births in Sweden between 2000 and 2016, including 4488 maternal injury claims filed with The National Swedish Patient Insurance Company (Löf), of which 1637 were compensated. Descriptive statistics on maternal and pregnancy characteristics, trends in filed/compensated claims over time, and distribution of compensated claims by clinical classification are presented. Characteristics associated with suboptimal care were identified using multivariable logistic regression, with mutual adjustment in the final model. Compensated claims were sorted into 14 clinical classifications (ICD-10 codes for main condition, injury, and causality). Overall, there was a two-fold increase in filed claims from 2000 to 2016, peaking in 2014. The rate of compensated claims only increased marginally, and 36.5% of filed claims were deemed avoidable. Perineal and pelvic floor injuries, as well as medical and diagnostic errors, were responsible for the majority of compensated claims. Women with a previous caesarean section, post term delivery, chronic or gestational disease, > 13 antenatal visits, or a multiple pregnancy had increased risk of having a compensated claim for a maternal injury during delivery. Understanding the risk factors for having a compensated maternal injury claim may guide health workers and maternity wards in improving the quality and organisation of care to reduce the risk of childbirth related injuries.
Funder
Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Karolinska Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. de Vries, E. N., Ramrattan, M. A., Smorenburg, S. M., Gouma, D. J. & Boermeester, M. A. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: A systematic review. Qual. Saf. Health Care 17(3), 216–223 (2008).
2. Panagioti, M. et al. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 17(366), l4185 (2019).
3. Skoogh, A., Hall-Lord, M. L., Bååth, C. & Bojö, A. S. Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 21(1), 1093 (2021).
4. Aibar, L., Rabanaque, M. J., Aibar, C., Aranaz, J. M. & Mozas, J. Patient safety and adverse events related with obstetric care. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 291(4), 825–830 (2015).
5. Florea, A. et al. The Ottawa hospital quality incident notification system for capturing adverse events in obstetrics. J. Obstetrics Gynaecol. Canada 32(7), 657–62 (2010).