Author:
Ahmed Md Sohel,Hanley Brenda J.,Mitchell Corey I.,Abbott Rachel C.,Hollingshead Nicholas A.,Booth James G.,Guinness Joe,Jennelle Christopher S.,Hodel Florian H.,Gonzalez-Crespo Carlos,Middaugh Christopher R.,Ballard Jennifer R.,Clemons Bambi,Killmaster Charlie H.,Harms Tyler M.,Caudell Joe N.,Benavidez Westrich Kathryn M.,McCallen Emily,Casey Christine,O’Brien Lindsey M.,Trudeau Jonathan K.,Stewart Chad,Carstensen Michelle,McKinley William T.,Hynes Kevin P.,Stevens Ashley E.,Miller Landon A.,Cook Merril,Myers Ryan T.,Shaw Jonathan,Tonkovich Michael J.,Kelly James D.,Grove Daniel M.,Storm Daniel J.,Schuler Krysten L.
Abstract
AbstractContinued spread of chronic wasting disease (CWD) through wild cervid herds negatively impacts populations, erodes wildlife conservation, drains resource dollars, and challenges wildlife management agencies. Risk factors for CWD have been investigated at state scales, but a regional model to predict locations of new infections can guide increasingly efficient surveillance efforts. We predicted CWD incidence by county using CWD surveillance data depicting white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in 16 eastern and midwestern US states. We predicted the binary outcome of CWD-status using four machine learning models, utilized five-fold cross-validation and grid search to pinpoint the best model, then compared model predictions against the subsequent year of surveillance data. Cross validation revealed that the Light Boosting Gradient model was the most reliable predictor given the regional data. The predictive model could be helpful for surveillance planning. Predictions of false positives emphasize areas that warrant targeted CWD surveillance because of similar conditions with counties known to harbor CWD. However, disagreements in positives and negatives between the CWD Prediction Web App predictions and the on-the-ground surveillance data one year later underscore the need for state wildlife agency professionals to use a layered modeling approach to ensure robust surveillance planning. The CWD Prediction Web App is at https://cwd-predict.streamlit.app/.
Funder
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Williams, E. & Young, S. Chronic wasting disease of captive mule deer: a spongiform encephalopathy. J. Wildl. Dis. 16, 89–96 (1980).
2. Poggiolini, I., Saverioni, D. & Parchi, P. Prion protein misfolding, strains, and neurotoxicity: An update from studies on mammalian prions. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/910314 (2013).
3. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Distribution of chronic wasting disease in North America. https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/distribution-chronic-wasting-disease-north-america-0. (2024).
4. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (AFWA). Best management practices for surveillance, management, and control of chronic wasting disease. fishwildlife.org/application/files/1315/7054/8052/AFWA_CWD_BMP_First_Supplement_FINAL.pdf. (Washington, DC, USA, 2018).
5. Schuler, K., Hollingshead, N., Kelly, J., Applegate, R., & Yoest, C. Risk-based surveillance for chronic wasting disease in Tennessee. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) Wildlife Technical Report 18–4 (2018).