Abstract
AbstractDiagnosing autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a complicated, time-consuming process which is particularly challenging in older individuals. One of the most widely used behavioral diagnostic tools is the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Previous work using machine learning techniques suggested that ASD detection in children can be achieved with substantially fewer items than the original ADOS. Here, we expand on this work with a specific focus on adolescents and adults as assessed with the ADOS Module 4. We used a machine learning algorithm (support vector machine) to examine whether ASD detection can be improved by identifying a subset of behavioral features from the ADOS Module 4 in a routine clinical sample of N = 673 high-functioning adolescents and adults with ASD (n = 385) and individuals with suspected ASD but other best-estimate or no psychiatric diagnoses (n = 288). We identified reduced subsets of 5 behavioral features for the whole sample as well as age subgroups (adolescents vs. adults) that showed good specificity and sensitivity and reached performance close to that of the existing ADOS algorithm and the full ADOS, with no significant differences in overall performance. These results may help to improve the complicated diagnostic process of ASD by encouraging future efforts to develop novel diagnostic instruments for ASD detection based on the identified constructs as well as aiding clinicians in the difficult question of differential diagnosis.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Lai, M. C., Lombardo, M. V. & Baron-Cohen, S. Autism. Lancet. 383, 896–910 (2014).
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. (American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA, 2013).
3. World Health Organization. The International Statistical Classification of Dieases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10). (World Health Organization, Geneva, 2016).
4. Kamp-Becker, I. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the ADOS and ADOS-2 in clinical practice. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 27, 1193–1207 (2018).
5. Charman, T. & Gotham, K. Measurement Issues: Screening and diagnostic instruments for autism spectrum disorders – lessons from research and practice. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 18(1), 52–63 (2013).
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献