Author:
Valerio Azzurra,Borrego C. Steven,Boitani Luigi,Casadei Luca,Giuliani Alessandro,Wielgus Robert B.,Simek Stephanie L.,Valerio Mariacristina
Abstract
AbstractFew field tests have assessed the effects of predator-induced stress on prey fitness, particularly in large carnivore-ungulate systems. Because traditional measures of stress present limitations when applied to free-ranging animals, new strategies and systemic methodologies are needed. Recent studies have shown that stress and anxiety related behaviors can influence the metabolic activity of the gut microbiome in mammal hosts, and these metabolic alterations may aid in identification of stress. In this study, we used NMR-based fecal metabolomic fingerprinting to compare the fecal metabolome, a functional readout of the gut microbiome, of cattle herds grazing in low vs. high wolf-impacted areas within three wolf pack territories. Additionally, we evaluated if other factors (e.g., cattle nutritional state, climate, landscape) besides wolf presence were related to the variation in cattle metabolism. By collecting longitudinal fecal samples from GPS-collared cattle, we found relevant metabolic differences between cattle herds in areas where the probability of wolf pack interaction was higher. Moreover, cattle distance to GPS-collared wolves was the factor most correlated with this difference in cattle metabolism, potentially reflecting the variation in wolf predation risk. We further validated our results through a regression model that reconstructed cattle distances to GPS-collared wolves based on the metabolic difference between cattle herds. Although further research is needed to explore if similar patterns also hold at a finer scale, our results suggests that fecal metabolomic fingerprinting is a promising tool for assessing the physiological responses of prey to predation risk. This novel approach will help improve our knowledge of the consequences of predators beyond the direct effect of predation.
Funder
Washington State Legislature
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Schmitz, O. J., Krivan, V. & Ovadia, O. Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett. 7, 153–163 (2004).
2. Creel, S. & Christianson, D. Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23(4), 194–201 (2008).
3. Ritchie, E. G. et al. Ecosystem restoration with teeth: what role for predators?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27(5), 265–271 (2012).
4. Terborgh, J. & Estes, J. A. Trophic Cascades: Predators, Prey, and the Changing Dynamics of Nature (Island Press, 2010).
5. Creel, S. & Winnie, J. A. Responses of elk herd size to fine scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves. Anim. Behav. 69, 1181–1189 (2005).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献