Author:
Choinski Mateusz,Stanczyk Magdalena,Szymaszek Aneta
Abstract
AbstractPeople with aphasia (PWA) often present deficits in non-linguistic cognitive functions, such as executive functions, working memory, and temporal information processing (TIP), which intensify the associated speech difficulties and hinder the rehabilitation process. Therefore, training targeting non-linguistic cognitive function deficiencies may be useful in the treatment of aphasia. The present study compared the effects of the novel Dr. Neuronowski® training method (experimental training), which particularly emphasizes TIP, with the linguistic training commonly applied in clinical practice (control training). Thirty four PWA underwent linguistic and non-linguistic assessments before and after the training as well as a follow-up assessment. Patients were randomly assigned to either experimental (n = 18) or control groups (n = 16). The experimental training improved both non-linguistic functions (TIP and verbal short-term and working memory) and linguistic functions: phoneme discrimination, sentence comprehension, grammar comprehension, verbal fluency, and naming. In contrast, the control training improved only grammar comprehension and naming. The follow-up assessment confirmed the stability of the effects of both trainings over time. Thus, in PWA, Dr. Neuronowski® training appears to have broader benefits for linguistic and non-linguistic functions than does linguistic training. This provides evidence that Dr. Neuronowski® may be considered a novel tool with potential clinical applications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference71 articles.
1. Saini, V., Guada, L. & Yavagal, D. R. Global epidemiology of stroke and access to acute ischemic stroke interventions. Neurology 97, S6–S16. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781 (2021).
2. Brady, M. C. Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke 52(5), 1778–1787. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031162 (2021).
3. Berg, K. et al. Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: An e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers. Aphasiology 36(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1852003 (2022).
4. Papathanasiou, I., Coppens, P. & Davidson, B. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders: Basic concepts, management, and efficacy. In Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders Vol. 2 (eds Papathanasiou, P. C. & Potagas, C.) 3–12 (Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2017).
5. Murray, L. L. Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: Presence and relation to language and communication measures. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 21(2), S51. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0067 (2012).