Author:
Wong Ting Yat,Fang Zhiqian,Yu Yat To,Cheung Charlton,Hui Christy L. M.,Elvevåg Brita,De Deyne Simon,Sham Pak Chung,Chen Eric Y. H.
Abstract
AbstractEmotions are not necessarily universal across different languages and cultures. Mental lexicons of emotions depend strongly on contextual factors, such as language and culture. The Chinese language has unique linguistic properties that are different from other languages. As a main variant of Chinese, Cantonese has some emotional expressions that are only used by Cantonese speakers. Previous work on Chinese emotional vocabularies focused primarily on Mandarin. However, little is known about Cantonese emotion vocabularies. This is important since both language variants might have distinct emotional expressions, despite sharing the same writing system. To explore the structure and organization of Cantonese-label emotion words, we selected 79 highly representative emotion cue words from an ongoing large-scale Cantonese word association study (SWOW-HK). We aimed to identify the categories of these emotion words and non-emotion words that related to emotion concepts. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to generate word clusters and investigate the underlying emotion dimensions. As the cluster quality was low in hierarchical clustering, we further constructed an emotion graph using a network approach to explore how emotions are organized in the Cantonese mental lexicon. With the support of emotion knowledge, the emotion graph defined more distinct emotion categories. The identified network communities covered basic emotions such as love, happiness, and sadness. Our results demonstrate that mental lexicon graphs constructed from free associations of Cantonese emotion-label words can reveal fine categories of emotions and their relevant concepts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Edelstein, R. S. & Shaver, P. R. A cross-cultural examination of lexical studies of self-conscious emotions. Self-Conscious Emotions Theory Res. 20, 194–208 (2007).
2. Barrett, L. F. Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 20–46 (2006).
3. Ekman, P. & Cordaro, D. What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emot. Rev. 3, 364–370 (2011).
4. Panksepp, J. Empathy and the laws of affect. Science 334, 1358–1359 (2011).
5. Lindquist, K. A., MacCormack, J. K. & Shablack, H. The role of language in emotion: Predictions from psychological constructionism. Front. Psychol. 6, 444 (2015).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献