Author:
Tilley Ceinwen A.,Carreño Gutierrez Hector,Sebire Marion,Obasaju Oluwapelumi,Reichmann Florian,Katsiadaki Ioanna,Barber Iain,Norton William H. J.
Abstract
Abstract
Model fish species such as sticklebacks and zebrafish are frequently used in studies that require DNA to be collected from live animals. This is typically achieved by fin clipping, a procedure that is simple and reliable to perform but that can harm fish. An alternative procedure to sample DNA involves swabbing the skin to collect mucus and epithelial cells. Although swabbing appears to be less invasive than fin clipping, it still requires fish to be netted, held in air and handled—procedures that can cause stress. In this study we combine behavioural and physiological analyses to investigate changes in gene expression, behaviour and welfare after fin clipping and swabbing. Swabbing led to a smaller change in cortisol release and behaviour on the first day of analysis compared to fin clipping. It also led to less variability in data suggesting that fewer animals need to be measured after using this technique. However, swabbing triggered some longer term changes in zebrafish behaviour suggesting a delayed response to sample collection. Skin swabbing does not require the use of anaesthetics and triggers fewer changes in behaviour and physiology than fin clipping. It is therefore a more refined technique for DNA collection with the potential to improve fish health and welfare.
Funder
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference75 articles.
1. Sloman, K. A., Bouyoucos, I. A., Brooks, E. J. & Sneddon, L. U. Ethical considerations in fish research. J. Fish Biol. 94, 556–577 (2019).
2. Clark, J. D., Gebhart, G. F., Gonder, J. C., Keeling, M. E. & Kohn, D. F. The 1996 guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. ILAR J. 38, 41–48 (1997).
3. De Lombaert, M., Rick, E. L., Krugner-Higby, L. A. & Wolman, M. A. Behavioral characteristics of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) after MS222 anesthesia for fin excision. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 56, 377–381 (2017).
4. Van de Weerd, H. A. et al. Effects of environmental enrichment for mice: variation in experimental results. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 5, 87–109 (2002).
5. Gouveia, K. & Hurst, J. L. Optimising reliability of mouse performance in behavioural testing: the major role of non-aversive handling. Sci. Rep. 7, 44999 (2017).
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Fin clipping does not increase opercular beat rate in tricaine-treated zebrafish;Laboratory Animals;2024-08-19
2. Skin swabbing protocol to collect DNA samples from small-bodied fish species;F1000Research;2024-06-27
3. Zebrafish;The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animals;2024-03-14
4. Fishes;The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animals;2024-03-14
5. Guidelines for the ethical treatment of nonhuman animals in behavioural research and teaching;Animal Behaviour;2024-01