Incremental and decremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing protocols produce similar maximum oxygen uptake in athletes

Author:

de Sousa Nuno Manuel FradeORCID,Bertucci Danilo RodriguesORCID,de Sant’Ana Gabriel Medeiros,Padua Pedro Luiz Ribeiro Angelucci,da Rosa Diogo Mello

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the maximal oxygen uptake ($$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2max) achieved during incremental and decremental protocols in highly trained athletes. Nineteen moderate trained runners and rowers completed, on separate days, (i) an initial incremental $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2max test (INC) on a treadmill, followed by a verification phase (VER); (ii) a familiarization of a decremental test (DEC); (iii) a tailored DEC; (iv) a test with decremental and incremental phases (DEC-INC); (v) and a repeated incremental test (INCF). During each test $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2, carbon dioxide production, ventilation, heart and breath rates and ratings of perceived exertion were measured. No differences were observed in $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2max between INC (61.3 ± 5.2 ml kg−1 min−1) and DEC (61.1 ± 5.1 ml kg−1 min−1; average difference of ~ 11.58 ml min−1; p = 0.831), between INC and DEC-INC (60.9 ± 5.3 ml kg−1 min−1; average difference of ~ 4.8 ml min−1; p = 0.942) or between INC and INCF (60.7 ± 4.4 ml kg−1 min−1; p = 0.394). $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2max during VER (59.8 ± 5.1 ml kg−1 min−1) was 1.50 ± 2.20 ml kg−1 min−1 lower (~ 2.45%; p = 0.008) compared with values measured during INC. The typical error in the test-to-test changes for evaluating $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2max over the five tests was 2.4 ml kg−1 min−1 (95% CI 1.4–3.4 ml kg−1 min−1). Decremental tests do not elicit higher $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2max than incremental tests in trained runners and rowers, suggesting that a plateau in $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2 during the classic incremental and verification tests represents the maximum ceiling of aerobic power.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3