Author:
Artoni Fiorenzo,Cometa Andrea,Dalise Stefania,Azzollini Valentina,Micera Silvestro,Chisari Carmelo
Abstract
AbstractThe effects of robotic-assisted gait (RAG) training, besides conventional therapy, on neuroplasticity mechanisms and cortical integration in locomotion are still uncertain. To advance our knowledge on the matter, we determined the involvement of motor cortical areas in the control of muscle activity in healthy subjects, during RAG with Lokomat, both with maximal guidance force (100 GF—passive RAG) and without guidance force (0 GF—active RAG) as customary in rehabilitation treatments. We applied a novel cortico-muscular connectivity estimation procedure, based on Partial Directed Coherence, to jointly study source localized EEG and EMG activity during rest (standing) and active/passive RAG. We found greater cortico-cortical connectivity, with higher path length and tendency toward segregation during rest than in both RAG conditions, for all frequency bands except for delta. We also found higher cortico-muscular connectivity in distal muscles during swing (0 GF), and stance (100 GF), highlighting the importance of direct supraspinal control to maintain balance, even when gait is supported by a robotic exoskeleton. Source-localized connectivity shows that this control is driven mainly by the parietal and frontal lobes. The involvement of many cortical areas also in passive RAG (100 GF) justifies the use of the 100 GF RAG training for neurorehabilitation, with the aim of enhancing cortical-muscle connections and driving neural plasticity in neurological patients.
Funder
Swiss National Science Foundation
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Regione Toscana
Ministry of University and Research and European Union
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Gimigliano, F. et al. Robot-assisted arm therapy in neurological health conditions: Rationale and methodology for the evidence synthesis in the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 57(5), 824–830 (2021).
2. Calabrò, R. S. et al. What does evidence tell us about the use of gait robotic devices in patients with multiple sclerosis? A comprehensive systematic review on functional outcomes and clinical recommendations. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 7, 841–849 (2021).
3. Carmignano, S. M. et al. Robot-assisted gait training in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Implications for clinical practice. A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation 51, 649–663 (2022).
4. Mehrholz, J., Hädrich, A., Platz, T., Kugler, J. & Pohl, M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD006876 (2012).
5. Kleim, J. A. & Jones, T. A. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage (2008).