Author:
Babanezhad Meisam,Behroyan Iman,Nakhjiri Ali Taghvaie,Rezakazemi Mashallah,Marjani Azam,Shirazian Saeed
Abstract
AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulating is a useful methodology for reduction of experiments and their associated costs. Although the CFD could predict all hydro-thermal parameters of fluid flows, the connections between such parameters with each other are impossible using this approach. Machine learning by the artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm has already shown the ability to intelligently record engineering data. However, there are no studies available to deeply investigate the implicit connections between the variables resulted from the CFD. The present investigation tries to conduct cooperation between the mechanistic CFD and the artificial algorithm. The genetic algorithm is combined with the fuzzy interface system (GAFIS). Turbulent forced convection of Al2O3/water nanofluid in a heated tube is simulated for inlet temperatures (i.e., 305, 310, 315, and 320 K). GAFIS learns nodes coordinates of the fluid, the inlet temperatures, and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) as inputs. The fluid temperature is learned as output. The number of inputs, population size, and the component are checked for the best intelligence. Finally, at the best intelligence, a formula is developed to make a relationship between the output (i.e. nanofluid temperatures) and inputs (the coordinates of the nodes of the nanofluid, inlet temperature, and TKE). The results revealed that the GAFIS intelligence reaches the highest level when the input number, the population size, and the exponent are 5, 30, and 3, respectively. Adding the turbulent kinetic energy as the fifth input, the regression value increases from 0.95 to 0.98. This means that by considering the turbulent kinetic energy the GAFIS reaches a higher level of intelligence by distinguishing the more difference between the learned data. The CFD and GAFIS predicted the same values of the nanofluid temperature.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Pryazhnikov, M., Minakov, A., Rudyak, V. Y. & Guzei, D. Thermal conductivity measurements of nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 104, 1275–1282 (2017).
2. Alawi, O. A., Sidik, N. A. C., Xian, H. W., Kean, T. H. & Kazi, S. N. Thermal conductivity and viscosity models of metallic oxides nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 116, 1314–1325 (2018).
3. Raja, R. A., Sunil, J. & Maheswaran, R. Estimation of thermo-physical properties of nanofluids using theoretical correlations. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 13, 7950–7953 (2018).
4. Phanindra, Y., Kumar, S. & Pugazhendhi, S. Experimental investigation on Al2O3 & Cu/Oil hybrid nano fluid using concentric tube heat exchanger. Mater. Today Proc. 5, 12142–12150 (2018).
5. Choi, S. U. & Eastman, J. A. Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Fluids with Nanoparticles (Argonne National Lab, United States, 1995).
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献