Author:
Machts René,Schindler Martina,Unterhauser-Chwastek Heike,Mertens Jan,Faust Katharina
Abstract
AbstractIn estimated 10–15% of neurosurgical interventions employing a conventional three-pin head fixation device (HFD) the patient’s head loses position due to slippage. At present no scientifically based stability criterion exists to potentially prevent the intraoperative loss of head position or skull fractures. Here, data on the skull penetration depth both on the single and two-pin side of a three-pin HFD are presented, providing scientific evidence for a stability criterion for the invasive three-pin head fixation. Eight fresh, chemically untreated human cadaveric heads were sequentially pinned 90 times in total in a noncommercially calibrated clamp screw applying a predefined force of 270 N (approximately 60 lbf) throughout. Three head positions were pinned each in standardized manner for the following approaches: prone, middle fossa, pterional. Titanium-aluminum alloy pins were used, varying the pin-cone angle on the single-pin side from 36° to 55° and on the two-pin side from 25° to 36°. The bone-penetration depths were directly measured by a dial gauge on neurocranium. The penetration depths on the single-pin side ranged from 0.00 mm (i.e., no penetration) to 6.17 mm. The penetration depths on the two-pin side ranged from 0.00 mm (no penetration) to 4.48 mm. We measured a significantly higher penetration depth for the anterior pin in comparison to the posterior pin on the two-pin side in prone position. One pin configuration (50°/25°) resulted in a quasi-homogenous pin depth distribution between the single- and the two-pin side. Emanating from the physical principle that pin depths behave proportionate to pin pressure distribution, a quasi-homogenous pin penetration depth may result in higher resilience against external shear forces or torque, thus reducing potential complications such as slippage and depressed skull fractures. The authors propose that the pin configuration of 50°/25° may be superior to the currently used uniform pin-cone angle distribution in common clinical practice (36°/36°). However, future research may identify additional influencing factors to improve head fixation stability.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference13 articles.
1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Neurosurgical Head Holders (Skull Clamps) and Device Slippage: FDA Safety Communication. from http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171115052215/https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm487665.htm; (Accessed 31.May.2023) (2016).
2. Cohen-Gadol, A. Loss of skull fixation. In Neurosurgical Atlas (ed. Cohen-Gadol, A.) (Neurosurgical Atlas, Inc, 2018). https://doi.org/10.18791/nsatlas.v2.14.3.
3. Cheng, G. et al. Potential risk analysis and experience summarization of unstable factors of cranial fixation devices in neurosurgical operations: Three-case reports and systematic review. Chin. Neurosurg. J. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-021-00244-2 (2021).
4. Sakakura, K. et al. Estimation of risk factors for head slippage using a head clamp system. A retrospective study. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 16, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S247402 (2020).
5. Sakakura, K., Fujimoto, A., Ishikawa, E., Enoki, H. & Okanishi, T. Intraoperative head slippage with the head clamp system can occur during epileptic surgery. World Neurosurg. 142, e453–e457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.051 (2020).