Abstract
Abstract
Responses elicited after the shortest latency spinal reflexes but prior to the onset of voluntary activity can display sophistication beyond a stereotypical reflex. Two distinct behaviors have been identified for these rapid motor responses, often called long-latency reflexes. The first is to maintain limb stability by opposing external perturbations. The second is to quickly release motor actions planned prior to the disturbance, often called a triggered reaction. This study investigated their interaction when motor tasks involve both limb stabilization and motor planning. We used a robotic manipulator to change the stability of the haptic environment during 2D arm reaching tasks, and to apply perturbations that could elicit rapid motor responses. Stabilizing reflexes were modulated by the orientation of the haptic environment (field effect) whereas triggered reactions were modulated by the target to which subjects were instructed to reach (target effect). We observed that there were no significant interactions between the target and field effects in the early (50–75 ms) portion of the long-latency reflex, indicating that these components of the rapid motor response are initially controlled independently. There were small but significant interactions for two of the six relevant muscles in the later portion (75–100 ms) of the reflex response. In addition, the target effect was influenced by the direction of the perturbation used to elicit the motor response, indicating a later feedback correction in addition to the early component of the triggered reaction. Together, these results demonstrate how distinct components of the long-latency reflex can work independently and together to generate sophisticated rapid motor responses that integrate planning with reaction to uncertain conditions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Liddell, E. G. T. & Sherrington, C. Reflexes in response to stretch (myotatic reflexes). P R Soc Lond B-Conta 96, 212–242,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1924.0023
(1924).
2. Hoffer, J. A. & Andreassen, S. Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. J Neurophysiol 45, 267–285 (1981).
3. Nichols, T. R. & Houk, J. C. Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39, 119–142 (1976).
4. Kearney, R. E., Stein, R. B. & Parameswaran, L. Identification of intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 44, 493–504,
https://doi.org/10.1109/10.581944
(1997).
5. Magladery, J. W., Porter, W. E., Park, A. M. & Teasdall, R. D. Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. IV. The two-neurone reflex and identification of certain action potentials from spinal roots and cord. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 88, 499–519 (1951).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献