Author:
Egger Martin,Florack Arnd
Abstract
AbstractIn two experiments, we investigated two untested assumptions regarding the mechanism by which selective attention during search affects subsequent preferences for objects. First, we tested whether an increase in visual competition during search increases preferences for relevant objects and decreases preferences for irrelevant objects subsequent to search. Second, we tested whether searching for objects increases the perceived fluency to process relevant objects and decreases the perceived fluency to process irrelevant objects. Our results show that search can affect relevant and irrelevant objects differently. Selective attention increased preferences for target objects subsequent to search, whereas selective attention did not affect preferences for distractors. Furthermore, our results indicate that searching for a target object increased the perceived fluency for this target object during choice, whereas ignoring a distractor product blocked mere exposure effects. Contrary to assumptions made in previous research, we found no indication that the competition for visual resources during search is linked to preferences for targets or distractors.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).
2. Moore, T. & Zirnsak, M. Neuronal mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 47–72 (2017).
3. Gollwitzer, P. M., Martiny-Huenger, T. & Oettingen, G. Affective consequences of intentional action control. In Advances in Motivation Science Vol. 1 (ed. Elliot, A. J.) 49–83 (Academic Press, 2014).
4. Raymond, J. Interactions of attention, emotion and motivation. In Progress in Brain Research Vol. 176 (ed. Srinivasan, N.) 293–308 (Elsevier, 2009).
5. Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E. & Kunar, M. A. The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 1055–1061 (2004).