Current practice of trabeculectomy in a cohort of experienced glaucoma surgeons in Australia and New Zealand
Author:
Lee Graham A.ORCID, Liu Lance, Casson Robert J., Danesh-Meyer Helen V., Shah Peter, Agar Ashish, Ashraff Nina, Baker Michelle, Brogan Kerr, Brooks Anne, Buller Alex, Casson Robert, Chan Helen, Cheng Jason, Danesh-Meyer Helen, Mellow Guy D’, Dunn Hamish, Gaskin Jennifer Fan, Gale Jesse, Goldberg Ivan, Green Catherine, Gregory-Roberts Emily, Healey Paul, Hurley Ian, Karaconji Tanya, Kaushik Shweta, Kerr Nathan, Kong George, Koppens Jo, Landers John, Lawlor Mitchell, Leaney John, Lee Graham, Lim Ridia, Liu Lance, Lusthaus Jed, Manning David, Martin Keith, Masselos Katherine, Nielsen Nathan, Ng Soo, Ng Jon, Perumal Divya, Shah Raj, Sindhu Kiran, Skalicky Simon, Soares Bernardo, Spencer Narelle, Symes Richard J., Walland Mark, Wang Bob, White Andrew, Yuen Joshua, Zagora Sophia,
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Objectives
To evaluate current routine trabeculectomy technique preferences among Australian and New Zealand Glaucoma Society surgeons regularly performing trabeculectomy surgery.
Subjects/Methods
Survey of experienced surgeons who perform trabeculectomy.
Results
Forty-nine surgeons (33 male:16 female) participated in the survey. Trabeculectomy was performed as day surgery (39/47, 83.0%) under local anesthesia (44/47, 93.6%). The surgical techniques most commonly used were a corneal traction suture (44/47, 93.6%), fornix-based conjunctival flap (43/47, 91.5%) and half-thickness scleral flap (38/47, 81.0%). Mitomycin C antifibrotic agent was used in routine cases by 45/46 (97.8%) surgeons. Surgeons applied the antifibrotic agent under the Tenon layer with a pledget (36/46, 78.2%) with a concentration of 0.02% (37/46, 80.4%) for 2 (11/46, 23.9%) or 3 min (30/46, 65.2%). The Kelly (26/46, 56.5%) and the Khaw Descemet (19/46, 41.3%) punches were used to perform the sclerostomy. Most surgeons performed a peripheral iridectomy in all phakic patients (46/47, 97.9%), but less commonly in pseudophakic patients (34/47, 72.3%). Techniques for closure of the limbal conjunctival edge were quite varied with a combination of suturing including purse string (21/47, 57.4%), wing (20/47, 42.6%) and horizontal mattress sutures (33/47, 70.2%). Surgeons reviewed their routine patients four times in the first month (29/47, 61.7%) and continued the postoperative topical steroids for 3–4 months (28/47, 59.6%).
Conclusions
Although a wide range of techniques for trabeculectomy exists among surgeons, there are consistent procedures currently in use to optimize patient outcomes. This report will assist surgeons in choosing which surgical techniques fit their best practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference15 articles.
1. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, Lichter PR, Varma R; CIGTS Study Group. Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1766–73. 2. Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66:673–79. 3. Vinod K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Panarelli JF, Chang TC, Chen PP, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:687–93. 4. Gedde SJ, Heuer DK, Parrish RK,II. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21:123–8. 5. Khan SA, Whittaker K, Razzaq MA, Arain UR. National survey of intraoperative mitomycin C use during trabeculectomy surgery in the UK. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41:1309–16.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|