Abstract
AbstractRecognising a potential visual-field (VF) defect in paediatric patients might be challenging, especially in children before the age of 5 years and those with developmental delay or intellectual disability. Visual electrophysiological testing is an objective and non-invasive technique for evaluation of visual function in paediatric patients, which can characterise the location of dysfunction and differentiate between disorders of the retina, optic nerve and visual pathway. The recording of electroretinography (ERG) and visual-evoked potentials (VEP) is possible from early days of life and requires no subjective input from the patient. As the origins of ERG and VEP tests are known, the pattern of electrophysiological changes can provide information about the VF of a child unable to perform accurate perimetry. This review summarises previously published electrophysiological findings in several common types of VF defects that can be found in paediatric patients (generalised VF defect, peripheral VF loss, central scotoma, bi-temporal hemianopia, altitudinal VF defect, quadrantanopia and homonymous hemianopia). It also shares experience on using electrophysiological testing as additional functional evidence to other tests in the clinical challenge of diagnosing or excluding VF defects in complex paediatric patients. Each type of VF defect is illustrated with one or two clinical cases.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference140 articles.
1. Patel DE, Cumberland PM, Walters BC, Russell-Eggitt I, Rahi JS, Khaw PT, et al. Study of optimal perimetric testing in children (OPTIC): Feasibility, reliability and repeatability of perimetry in children. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–12.
2. Dale NJ, Sonksen P. Developmental outcome, including setback, in young children with severe visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44(September):613–22.
3. Murray IC, Schmoll C, Perperidis A, Brash HM, McTrusty AD, Cameron LA, et al. Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry in children with brain tumours. Eye. 2018;32:1563–73.
4. Allen LE, Slater ME, Proffitt RV, Quarton E, Pelah A. A new perimeter using the preferential looking response to assess peripheral visual fields in young and developmentally delayed children. J AAPOS. 2012;16(Jun):261–5.
5. Tailor V, Glaze S, Unwin H, Bowman R, Thompson G, Dahlmann-Noor A. Saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry in children with neurodisability or isolated visual pathway lesions: observational cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1427–32.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献