Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference6 articles.
1. Avery KNL, Wilson N, Macefield R, McNair A, Hoffmann C, Blazeby JM, et al. A core outcome set for seamless, standardized evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices (COHESIVE): a patient and professional stakeholder consensus study. Ann Surg. 2021. Epub ahead of print.
2. Hirst A, Agha RA, Rosin D, McCulloch P. How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action. Int J Surg. 2013;11:1038–42.
3. Royal College of Surgeons Professional Standards Committee. Surgical innovation, new techniques and technologies—a guide to good practice. London: Royal College of Surgeons, England; 2019. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/-/media/files/rcs/standards-and-research/standards-and-policy/good-practice-guides/old-documents/surgical-innovation-new-techniques-and-technologies.pdf.
4. Lee Char SJ, Hills NK, Lo B, Kirkwood KS. Informed consent for innovative surgery: a survey of patients and surgeons. Surgery. 2013;153:473–80.
5. Broekman MLD. Ethics of innovation in neurosurgery. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献