Response to ‘Randomised controlled trials do not always give the results we want but that doesn’t mean we should abandon randomised controlled trials’-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Response to ‘Randomised controlled trials do not always give the results we want but that doesn’t mean we should abandon randomised controlled trials’

Published:2015-08-18 Issue:12 Volume:53 Page:897-898
ISSN:1362-4393
Container-title:Spinal Cord
language:en
Short-container-title:Spinal Cord

Author:

Wernig A

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,General Medicine

Link

http://www.nature.com/articles/sc2015144.pdf

Reference15 articles.

1. Harvey LA . Randomised controlled trials do not always give the results we want but that doesn’t mean we should abandon randomised controlled trials. Spinal Cord 2015; 53: 251.

2. Gehan EA . The scientific basis of clinical trials: statistical approach. Clin Cancer Res 1997; 3: 2587–2590.

3. Lammertse DP . Clinical trials in spinal cord injury: lessons learned on the path to translation. The 2011 International Spinal Cord Society Sir Ludwig Guttmann Lecture. Spinal Cord 2013; 51: 2–9.

4. Dobkin BH, Apple D, Barbeau H, Basso M, Behrman A, Deforge D et al. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17: 153–167.

5. Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, Basso M, Behrman A, Deforge D et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology 2006; 66: 484–493.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Motor Control of Human Spinal Cord Disconnected from the Brain and Under External Movement;Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology;2016