The predictive value of MRI scores for neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with neonatal encephalopathy

Abstract

Abstract Background MRI scoring systems are utilized to quantify brain injury and predict outcome in infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE). Our aim was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of total scores, white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) subscores of Barkovich and Weeke scoring systems for neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age in infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia for NE. Methods Data of 162 infants were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. DeLong tests were used to compare areas under the curve of corresponding items of the two scoring systems. LASSO logistic regression was carried out to evaluate the association between MRI scores and adverse composite (death or severe disabilities), motor and cognitive outcomes (Bayley developmental index <70). Results Weeke scores predicted each outcome measure with greater accuracy than the corresponding items of Barkovich system (DeLong tests p < 0.03). Total scores, GM and cerebellum involvement were associated with increased odds for adverse outcomes, in contrast to WM injury, after adjustment to 5’ Apgar score, first postnatal lactate and aEEG normalization within 48 h. Conclusion A more detailed scoring system had better predictive value for adverse outcome. GM injury graded on both scoring systems was an independent predictor of each outcome measure. Impact statements A more detailed MRI scoring system had a better predictive value for motor, cognitive and composite outcomes. While hypoxic-ischemic brain injuries in the deep grey matter and cerebellum were predictive of adverse outcome, white matter injury including cortical involvement was not associated with any of the outcome measures at 2 years of age. Structured MRI evaluation based on validated scores may aid future clinical research, as well as inform parents and caregivers to optimize care beyond the neonatal period.