Postnatal growth and neurodevelopment at 2 years’ corrected age in extremely low birthweight infants
-
Published:2024-02-09
Issue:2
Volume:96
Page:436-449
-
ISSN:0031-3998
-
Container-title:Pediatric Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Pediatr Res
Author:
Nyakotey David A., Clarke Angelica M., Cormack Barbara E., Bloomfield Frank H., Harding Jane E.ORCID, , , Bloomfield Frank H., Jiang Yannan, Crowther Caroline A., Cormack Barbara E., , Bloomfield Frank, Broadbent Roland, McCaffrey Frances, Lynn Adrienne, Spencer Carole, Ellis Nicola, Graham Trish, Hewson Michael, Patel Harshad, Gibson Mel, Wilkes Natalie, Nair Arun, Harris Deborah, Streifler Nicola, Edwards Stephanie, Sisterson Rebecca, Akehurst Kimberly, Meyer Mike, de Monteverde Aiza, Yu Audrey, Tapnio Cristina, Alexander Tanith, Cormack Barbara, Huth Sabine, Liley Helen, Bates Suzanne, Jacobs Sue, Argus Brenda, Twitchell Emily
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Faltering postnatal growth in preterm babies is associated with adverse neurodevelopment. However, which growth reference is most helpful for predicting neurodevelopment is unknown. We examined associations between faltering growth and developmental delay in extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants.
Methods
We categorized faltering growth (z-score decrease ≥0.8 for weight/length, >1 for head circumference) between birth, 4 weeks, 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age and 2 years’ corrected age using fetal (Fenton, UK-WHO and Olsen) and healthy preterm (INTERGROWTH-21st) references. Associations between faltering growth and developmental delay were examined using binary logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).
Results
In 327 infants, Olsen charts identified the highest prevalence of faltering growth (weight 37%, length 63%, head 45%). Agreement in classification was higher amongst fetal references (kappa coefficient, ĸ = 0.46–0.94) than between INTERGROWTH-21st and fetal references (ĸ = 0.10–0.81). Faltering growth in all measures between 4–36 weeks (odds ratio, OR 2.0–4.7) compared with other time intervals (OR 1.7–2.7) were more strongly associated with developmental delay, particularly motor delay (OR 2.0–4.7). All growth references were poorly predictive of developmental delay at 2 years (AUC ≤ 0.62).
Conclusions
Faltering postnatal growth in ELBW infants is associated with, but is poorly predictive of, developmental delay at 2 years.
Impact
In babies born preterm, different growth references result in wide variation in categorization of faltering postnatal growth.
Faltering growth in weight, length, and head circumference from 4 weeks to 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age are associated with developmental delay at 2 years’ corrected age, particularly motor delay.
However, postnatal growth is a poor predictor of later developmental delay in extremely low birthweight infants irrespective of the growth reference used.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Pierrat, V. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: epipage-2 cohort study. BMJ 358, j3448 (2017). 2. Adams-Chapman, I. et al. Neurodevelopmental impairment among extremely preterm infants in the neonatal research network. Pediatrics 141, e20173091 (2018). 3. Spittle, A. J. & Orton, J. Cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder in children born preterm. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 19, 84–89 (2014). 4. Vohr, B. R. Neonatology: A Practical Approach to Neonatal Diseases (Buonocore, G., Bracci, R. & Weindling, M. eds.) 2031–2054 (Springer International Publishing, 2018). 5. Pascal, A. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm and very‐low‐birthweight infants born over the past decade: a meta‐analytic review. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 60, 342–355 (2018).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|