Abstract
AbstractAntimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are key components of innate immunity across all domains of life. Natural and synthetic AMPs are receiving renewed attention in efforts to combat the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis and the loss of antibiotic efficacy. The gram-negative pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most concerning infecting bacteria in AMR, particularly in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) where respiratory infections are difficult to eradicate and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Cationic AMPs exploit the negatively charged lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on P. aeruginosa to bind and disrupt bacterial membrane(s), causing lethal damage. P. aeruginosa modifies its LPS to evade AMP killing. Free-LPS is also a component of CF sputum and feeds pro-inflammatory cycles. Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a random peptide co-polymer—of glycine, lysine, alanine, tyrosine—used as a drug in treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS); we have previously shown GA to be an AMP which synergises with tobramycin against CF P. aeruginosa, functioning via bacterial membrane disruption. Here, we demonstrate GA’s direct binding and sequestration/neutralisation of P. aeruginosa LPS, in keeping with GA’s ability to disrupt the outer membrane. At CF-relevant LPS concentrations, however, membrane disruption by GA was not strongly inhibited. Furthermore, exposure to GA did not result in increased Lipid A modification of LPS or in increased gene expression of systems involved in AMP sensing and LPS modification. Therefore, despite the electrostatic targeting of LPS by GA as part of its activity, P. aeruginosa does not demonstrate LPS modification in its defence.
Funder
Cystic Fibrosis Trust
RCUK | Medical Research Council
DH | National Institute for Health Research
RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Imperial College Research Fellowship
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference120 articles.
1. Murray, C. J. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).
2. Laxminarayan, R. The overlooked pandemic of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 399, 606–607 (2022).
3. Fowler, V. G., Jezek, A., Spivak, E. S. & Talkington, K. Urgent, Comprehensive Federal Action Needed To Stem Mortality and Medicare Costs Associated With Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 74, 1107–1111 (2021).
4. O’Neill, J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations: the review on antimicrobial resistance. 1–35 https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160525_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf (2019).
5. Mestrovic, T. et al. The burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in the WHO European region in 2019: a cross-country systematic analysis. Lancet Public Heal. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00225-0 (2022).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献