Abstract
AbstractThe Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been producing influential reports for over 35 years. As the IPCC’s Seventh Assessment Report (AR7) cycle begins, we offer our perspective as former members of the IPCC Technical Support Units from Working Groups I, II & III, and the Synthesis Report on lessons learned during the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) cycle. We identify three broad issues that, if addressed, could reinforce and sustain the IPCC in continuing its mission to comprehensively assess the scientific understanding of human-induced climate change. These are the imperative to ensure balanced representation, the importance of author recognition, and the need for improved institutional memory. Our recommendations include addressing skill and training needs, tackling barriers to participation particularly for Global South authors, and ensuring all contributors receive appropriate recognition for their efforts. We focus, in particular, on feasible incremental changes that could be implemented during AR7 without major changes to the underlying procedures that require approval by the 195 member governments that make up the IPCC.
Funder
RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. UN General Assembly (43rd sess.: 1988-1989). Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind: Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly. (UN General Assembly, 1988).
2. Miguel, J. C. H., Taddei, R. & Monteiro, M. Civic Epistemologies. in A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. de Pryck, K. & Hulme, M.) 217–224 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2022).
3. Lidskog, R. & Sundqvist, G. Political Context. in A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. de Pryck, K. & Hulme, M.) 209–216 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2022).
4. Hoppe, I. & Rödder, S. Speaking with one voice for climate science—climate researchers’ opinion on the consensus policy of the IPCC. J. Sci.Commun. 18, A04 (2019).
5. de Pryck, K. Controversial practices: tracing the proceduralization of the IPCC in time and space. Glob. Policy 12, 80–89 (2021).