Abstract
AbstractThe scientific literature, media, international summits, and policy forums highlighted enough the people who either move or are willing to move because of environmental reasons. Still, the voluntary environmental non-migrants (ENM), who are assumed to have strong resilience and coping capacity, are inordinately overlooked. The importance of addressing these ENMs has increasingly been emphasised. First, the paper explains the characteristics of ENM, outlining the key distinction between voluntary and forced non-migrants. Second, it emphasises the need to protect populations affected by environmental change and disaster, specifically highlighting oft-neglected ENM policy gaps. Thus, it examines to what extent ENM is addressed in existing global legal and policy responses. Having identified the gaps, it further considers the importance of adaptation strategies and well-planned relocation policies to support non-migration. Finally, it summarises the existing ENM policies’ scope and reflects on the key policy gaps identified to suggest the way forward. This paper urges for a pragmatic and strategic policy approach that ensures bottom-up community-oriented approaches for supporting ENM by: (i) coordinating adaptation activities, (ii) ensuring planned relocation and migration with dignity, (iii) enabling informed decision-making, (iv) mobilising national and international support, and (v) developing appropriate institutional structures for adaptation.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Edith Cowan University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. Adams, H. Why populations persist: mobility, place attachment and climate change. Popul. Environ. 37, 429–448 (2016).
2. Hunter, L. M. Migration and environmental hazards. Popul. Environ. 26, 273–302 (2005).
3. Mallick, B. The nexus between socio-ecological system, livelihood resilience, and migration decisions: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability 11, 3332 (2019).
4. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri & L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 151 (2014).
5. Schewel, K. Understanding immobility: moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. Int. Migr. Rev. 54, 328–355 (2020).