Abstract
AbstractOwing to the intensified domestication process with artificial trait selection, introgressive hybridisation between domestic and wild species poses a management problem. Traditional free-range livestock husbandry, as practiced in Corsica and Sardinia, is known to facilitate hybridisation between wild boars and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Here, we assessed the genetic distinctness and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry levels of the Corsican wild boar subspecies S. s. meridionalis, with reference to its Sardinian conspecifics, employing a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay and mitochondrial control region (mtCR) haplotypes. We also assessed the reliance of morphological criteria and the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) coat colour gene to identify individuals with domestic introgression. While Corsican wild boars showed closest affinity to Sardinian and Italian wild boars compared to other European populations based on principal component analysis, the observation of previously undescribed mtCR haplotypes and high levels of nuclear divergence (Weir’s θ > 0.14) highlighted the genetic distinctness of Corsican S. s. meridionalis. Across three complementary analyses of mixed ancestry (i.e., STRUCTURE, PCADMIX, and ELAI), proportions of domestic pig ancestry were estimated at 9.5% in Corsican wild boars, which was significantly higher than in wild boars in Sardinia, where free-range pig keeping was banned in 2012. Comparison of morphologically pure- and hybrid-looking Corsican wild boars suggested a weak correlation between morphological criteria and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry. The study highlights the usefulness of molecular markers to assess the direct impacts of management practices on gene flow between domestic and wild species.
Funder
Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle Luxembourg
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics
Reference99 articles.
1. Albarella U, Dobney K, Rowley-Conwy P (2009) Size and shape of the Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa), with a view to the reconstruction of its Holocene history. Environ Archaeol 14:103–136
2. Albarella U, Manconi F, Vigne PRJ (2006) Pigs of Corsica and Sardinia: a biometrical re-evaluation of their status and history. In: Tecchiati, U, Sala, B (eds.) Archaeozoological Studies in Honour of Alfredo Riedel. Province of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy, p. 285–302
3. Albarella U, Manconi F, Vigne J-D, Rowley-Conwy P (2007) Ethnoarchaeology of pig husbandry in Sardinia and Corsica. In: Albarella U, Dobney K, Ervynck A, Rowley-Conwy P (eds.) Pigs Humans 10,000 Years Interact Oxford. Oxford Univ Press, p. 285–304
4. Albrechtsen A, Nielsen FC, Nielsen R (2010) Ascertainment biases in SNP chips affect measures of population divergence. Mol Biol Evol 27:2534–2547
5. Allendorf FW, Leary R, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献