Abstract
AbstractGenomics-based, longitudinal comparisons between ex situ and in situ agrobiodiversity conservation strategies can contribute to a better understanding of their underlying effects. However, landrace designations, ambiguous common names, and gaps in sampling information complicate the identification of matching ex situ and in situ seed lots. Here we report a 50-year longitudinal comparison of the genetic diversity of a set of 13 accessions from the state of Morelos, Mexico, conserved ex situ since 1967 and retrieved in situ from the same donor families in 2017. We interviewed farmer families who donated in situ landraces to understand their germplasm selection criteria. Samples were genotyped by sequencing, producing 74,739 SNPs. Comparing the two sample groups, we show that ex situ and in situ genome-wide diversity was similar. In situ samples had 3.1% fewer SNPs and lower pairwise genetic distances (Fst 0.008–0.113) than ex situ samples (Fst 0.031–0.128), but displayed the same heterozygosity. Despite genome-wide similarities across samples, we could identify several loci under selection when comparing in situ and ex situ seed lots, suggesting ongoing evolution in farmer fields. Eight loci in chromosomes 3, 5, 6, and 10 showed evidence of selection in situ that could be related with farmers’ selection criteria surveyed with focus groups and interviews at the sampling site in 2017, including wider kernels and larger ear size. Our results have implications for ex situ collection resampling strategies and the in situ conservation of threatened landraces.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics
Reference106 articles.
1. Akem C, Ceccarelli S, Erskine W, Lenné J (2000) Using genetic diversity for disease resistance in agricultural production. Outlook Agric 29:25–30
2. Alves Lima M, de L, Lopes de Souza C, Vieira Bento DA, Pereira de Souza A, Carlini-Garcia LA (2006) Mapping QTL for grain yield and plant traits in a tropical maize population. Mol Breed 17:227–239
3. Anderson E, Cutler HC (1942) Races of Zea Mays: I. Their recognition and classification. Ann Mo Bot Gard 29:69
4. Arias L, Latournerie L, Montiel S, Sauri E (2007) Cambios recientes en la diversidad de maíces criollos de Yucatán, México. Univ y Cienc 23:69–73
5. Arteaga MC, Moreno-Letelier A, Mastretta-Yanes A, Vázquez-Lobo A, Breña-Ochoa A, Moreno-Estrada A et al. (2016) Genomic variation in recently collected maize landraces from Mexico. Genom Data 7:38–45
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献