Garetosmab in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial
-
Published:2023-09-28
Issue:10
Volume:29
Page:2615-2624
-
ISSN:1078-8956
-
Container-title:Nature Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Med
Author:
Di Rocco Maja, Forleo-Neto EduardoORCID, Pignolo Robert J., Keen Richard, Orcel Philippe, Funck-Brentano Thomas, Roux Christian, Kolta Sami, Madeo AnnalisaORCID, Bubbear Judith S., Tabarkiewicz Jacek, Szczepanek Małgorzata, Bachiller-Corral JavierORCID, Cheung Angela M., Dahir Kathryn M., Botman Esmée, Raijmakers Pieter G., Al Mukaddam Mona, Tile Lianne, Portal-Celhay Cynthia, Sarkar Neena, Hou Peijie, Musser Bret J., Boyapati Anita, Mohammadi KushaORCID, Mellis Scott J.ORCID, Rankin Andrew J., Economides Aris N.ORCID, Trotter Dinko Gonzalez, Herman Gary A., O’Meara Sarah J., DelGizzi Richard, Weinreich David M., Yancopoulos George D., Eekhoff E. Marelise W.ORCID, Kaplan Frederick S.
Abstract
AbstractFibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare disease characterized by heterotopic ossification (HO) in connective tissues and painful flare-ups. In the phase 2 LUMINA-1 trial, adult patients with FOP were randomized to garetosmab, an activin A-blocking antibody (n = 20) or placebo (n = 24) in period 1 (28 weeks), followed by an open-label period 2 (28 weeks; n = 43). The primary end points were safety and for period 1, the activity and size of HO lesions. All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event during period 1, notably epistaxis, madarosis and skin abscesses. Five deaths (5 of 44; 11.4%) occurred in the open-label period and, while considered unlikely to be related, causality cannot be ruled out. The primary efficacy end point in period 1 (total lesion activity by PET–CT) was not met (P = 0.0741). As the development of new HO lesions was suppressed in period 1, the primary efficacy end point in period 2 was prospectively changed to the number of new HO lesions versus period 1. No placebo patients crossing over to garetosmab developed new HO lesions (0% in period 2 versus 40.9% in period 1; P = 0.0027). Further investigation of garetosmab in FOP is ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03188666.
Funder
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Pignolo, R. J., Shore, E. M. & Kaplan, F. S. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: clinical and genetic aspects. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 6, 80 (2011). 2. Baujat, G. et al. Prevalence of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) in France: an estimate based on a record linkage of two national databases. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 12, 123 (2017). 3. Liljesthrom, M., Pignolo, R. J. & Kaplan, F. S. Epidemiology of the global fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) community. J. Rare Dis. Res Treat. 5, 31–36 (2020). 4. Morales-Piga, A. et al. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva in Spain: epidemiological, clinical, and genetic aspects. Bone 51, 748–755 (2012). 5. Pignolo, R. J. et al. Prevalence of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) in the United States: estimate from three treatment centers and a patient organization. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 16, 350 (2021).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|