Motixafortide and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 trial
-
Published:2023-04
Issue:4
Volume:29
Page:869-879
-
ISSN:1078-8956
-
Container-title:Nature Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Med
Author:
Crees Zachary D.ORCID, Rettig Michael P.ORCID, Jayasinghe Reyka G.ORCID, Stockerl-Goldstein KeithORCID, Larson Sarah M., Arpad Illes, Milone Giulio A., Martino MassimoORCID, Stiff PatrickORCID, Sborov Douglas, Pereira DeniseORCID, Micallef Ivana, Moreno-Jiménez GemmaORCID, Mikala GaborORCID, Coronel Maria Liz Paciello, Holtick Udo, Hiemenz John, Qazilbash Muzaffar H., Hardy Nancy, Latif Tahir, García-Cadenas Irene, Vainstein-Haras Abi, Sorani Ella, Gliko-Kabir Irit, Goldstein Inbal, Ickowicz Debby, Shemesh-Darvish Liron, Kadosh Shaul, Gao Feng, Schroeder Mark A.ORCID, Vij Ravi, DiPersio John F.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves survival in multiple myeloma (MM). However, many individuals are unable to collect optimal CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) numbers with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization. Motixafortide is a novel cyclic-peptide CXCR4 inhibitor with extended in vivo activity. The GENESIS trial was a prospective, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with the objective of assessing the superiority of motixafortide + G-CSF over placebo + G-CSF to mobilize HSPCs for ASCT in MM. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients collecting ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells kg–1 within two apheresis procedures; the secondary endpoint was to achieve this goal in one apheresis. A total of 122 adult patients with MM undergoing ASCT were enrolled at 18 sites across five countries and randomized (2:1) to motixafortide + G-CSF or placebo + G-CSF for HSPC mobilization. Motixafortide + G-CSF enabled 92.5% to successfully meet the primary endpoint versus 26.2% with placebo + G-CSF (odds ratio (OR) 53.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14.12–201.33, P < 0.0001). Motixafortide + G-CSF also enabled 88.8% to meet the secondary endpoint versus 9.5% with placebo + G-CSF (OR 118.0, 95% CI 25.36–549.35, P < 0.0001). Motixafortide + G-CSF was safe and well tolerated, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse events observed being transient, grade 1/2 injection site reactions (pain, 50%; erythema, 27.5%; pruritis, 21.3%). In conclusion, motixafortide + G-CSF mobilized significantly greater CD34+ HSPC numbers within two apheresis procedures versus placebo + G-CSF while preferentially mobilizing increased numbers of immunophenotypically and transcriptionally primitive HSPCs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03246529
Funder
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference50 articles.
1. Raab, M. S., Podar, K., Breitkreutz, I., Richardson, P. G. & Anderson, K. C. Multiple myeloma. Lancet 374, 324–339 (2009). 2. Kumar, S. K. et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 111, 2516–2520 (2008). 3. Palumbo, A. & Anderson, K. Multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1046–1060 (2011). 4. Child, J. A. et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1875–1883 (2003). 5. Fermand, J. P. et al. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long-term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 9227–9233 (2005).
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|