Abstract
AbstractThe utilization of optimal orthodontic force is crucial to prevent undesirable side effects and ensure efficient tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. However, the sensitivity of existing detection techniques is not sufficient, and the criteria for evaluating optimal force have not been yet established. Here, by employing 3D finite element analysis methodology, we found that the apical distal region (A-D region) of mesial roots is particularly sensitive to orthodontic force in rats. Tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP)-positive osteoclasts began accumulating in the A-D region under the force of 40 grams (g), leading to alveolar bone resorption and tooth movement. When the force reached 80 g, TRAP-positive osteoclasts started appearing on the root surface in the A-D region. Additionally, micro-computed tomography revealed a significant root resorption at 80 g. Notably, the A-D region was identified as a major contributor to whole root resorption. It was determined that 40 g is the minimum effective force for tooth movement with minimal side effects according to the analysis of tooth movement, inclination, and hyalinization. These findings suggest that the A-D region with its changes on the root surface is an important consideration and sensitive indicator when evaluating orthodontic forces for a rat model. Collectively, our investigations into this region would aid in offering valuable implications for preventing and minimizing root resorption during patients’ orthodontic treatment.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
Chinese Orthodontic Society Basic Research Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. McKiernan, E. X., McKiernan, F. & Jones, M. L. Psychological profiles and motives of adults seeking orthodontic treatment. Int. J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg. 7, 187–198 (1992).
2. Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W. & Moray, L. J. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg. 13, 97–106 (1998).
3. Reitan, K. Effects of force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolar bone types. Angle Orthod. 34, 244–255 (1964).
4. Meikle, M. C. The tissue, cellular, and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt. Eur. J. Orthod. 28, 221–240 (2006).
5. Kraiwattanapong, K. & Samruajbenjakun, B. Tissue response resulting from different force magnitudes combined with corticotomy in rats. Angle Orthod. 89, 797–803 (2019).