Author:
Kusunose Mayumi,Muto Kaori
Abstract
AbstractJapan’s government aims to promote the linkage of medical records, including medical genomic testing data and personal health records (PHRs), via cloud computing (the cloud). However, linking national medical records and using them for health care research can be controversial. Additionally, many ethical issues with using cloud networks with health care and genome data have been noted. However, no research has yet explored the Japanese public’s opinions about their PHRs, including genome data, being shared for health care research or the use of the cloud for storing and analyzing such data. Therefore, we conducted a survey in March 2021 to clarify the public’s attitudes toward sharing their PHRs, including genome data and using the cloud for health care research. We analyzed data to experimentally create digital health basic literacy scores (BLSs). Our results showed that the Japanese public had concerns about data sharing that overlapped with structural cloud computing issues. The effect of incentives on changes in participants’ willingness to share data (WTSD) was limited. Instead, there could be a correlation between WTSD and BLSs. Finally, we argue that it is vital to consider not only researchers but also research participants as value cocreators in health care research conducted through the cloud to overcome both parties’ vulnerability.
Funder
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry
Reference33 articles.
1. Smits, J. The future of the national virtual EPR in the Netherlands: changes in approaching large-scale exchange of information in Dutch Healthcare. JCC 4, 3–15 (2013).
2. Garrety, K., McLoughlin, I., Wilson, R., Zelle, G. & Martin, M. National electronic health records and the digital disruption of moral orders. Soc. Sci. Med. 101, 70–77 (2014). (1982).
3. Carter, P., Laurie, G. T. & Dixon-Woods, M. The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble. J. Med. Ethics. 41, 404–409 (2015).
4. Sterckx, S., Rakic, V., Cockbain, J. & Borry, P. “You hoped we would sleep walk into accepting the collection of our data”: controversies surrounding the UK care.data scheme and their wider relevance for biomedical research. Med. Health Care Philos. 19, 177–190 (2015). 2016.
5. Vezyridis, P. & Timmons, S. Understanding the care.data conundrum: new information flows for economic growth. Big Data Soc. 4, 205395171668849 (2017).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献