Reprint: Good Laboratory Practice: Preventing Introduction of Bias at the Bench

Author:

Macleod Malcolm R1,Fisher Marc2,O'Collins Victoria34,Sena Emily S134,Dirnagl Ulrich5,Bath Philip MW6,Buchan Alistair7,van der Worp H Bart8,Traystman Richard J9,Minematsu Kazuo10,Donnan Geoffrey A34,Howells David W34

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

2. Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA

3. National Stroke Research Institute, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

4. Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

5. Charité Department for Experimental Neurology, Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany

6. Stroke Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

7. Acute Stroke Program, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

8. Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

9. Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA

10. Cerebrovascular Division, Department of Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

Abstract

As a research community, we have failed to show that drugs, which show substantial efficacy in animal models of cerebral ischemia, can also improve outcome in human stroke. Accumulating evidence suggests this may be due, at least in part, to problems in the design, conduct, and reporting of animal experiments which create a systematic bias resulting in the overstatement of neuroprotective efficacy. Here, we set out a series of measures to reduce bias in the design, conduct and reporting of animal experiments modeling human stroke.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology,Neurology

Cited by 58 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3