Genomic sequencing in newborn screening: balancing consent with the right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found

Author:

Knoppers Bartha MariaORCID,Bonilha Ana ElizaORCID,Laberge Anne-Marie,Ahmed Arzoo,Newson Ainsley J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, we explore key aspects of the complex ethical and legal landscape surrounding consent in the context of incorporating genomic sequencing into existing newborn bloodspot screening programs. In particular, we consider the potential impact of genomic sequencing on the health rights of the child in relation to existing consent practices in newborn screening. We begin with an introduction to newborn screening programs and their population health goals. We then discuss public health ethics as a rationale underpinning newborn screening before turning to consent. We go on to describe seven current research projects on genomic sequencing in newborn screening and then introduce the ‘right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found’ as a useful concept to draw on when considering consent to newborn screening. We draw on this novel right to argue for the adoption of “appropriate consent” when it comes to certain uses of genomics in newborn screening. We contend that, for ‘virtual panels’ at least, appropriate consent proportionately balances the ongoing universality of newborn screening for important health conditions with an acknowledgement of the complex outcomes that bringing a complicated diagnostic technology into the screening domain will generate.

Funder

Medical Research Future Fund

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé

Fonds de Recherche du Quebec- Senior Clinician-Scientist Salary

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Guthrie R. The origin of newborn screening. Screening. 1992;1:5–15.

2. Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization- Public Health Papers. 1968. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/37650/WHO_PHP_34.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2024.

3. Pereira S, Clayton EW. Commercial Interests, the technological imperative, and advocates: Three forces driving genomic sequencing in newborns. Hast Cent Rep. 2018;48:S43–4.

4. Therrell BL, Padilla CD, Borrajo GJC, Khneisser I, Schielen PCJI, Knight-Madden J, et al. Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020–2023). Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024;10:38.

5. Loeber JG, Platis D, Zetterström RH, Almashanu S, Boemer F, Bonham JR, et al. Neonatal screening in Europe revisited: An ISNS perspective on the current state and developments since 2010. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021;7:15.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3