Are the standards of professionalism expected in dentistry justified? Views of dental professionals and the public

Author:

Barrow Hannah,Bartlett Sophie,Bullock Alison,Cowpe Jonathan

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction In the UK, the General Dental Council specifies nine principles of professional standards that dental registrants must follow. There are views that such standards are high, patients' expectations are rising, and the professionalism of dental professionals is increasingly scrutinised. This paper explores whether the high standards expected in dentistry are justified.Methods We applied thematic analysis to 772 free-text responses from dental team members and the public to a modified Delphi survey. Respondents described their views of professional and unprofessional behaviours in dentistry. Data were obtained as part of a larger review of professionalism in dentistry.Results Two lines of argument were identified: professionalism standards are high, but justifiably so; and professionalism standards are too high. Within these, four broad themes emerged: patient trust; comparison with other professions; a culture of fear; and perfection.Conclusion High professionalism standards are justified in a profession where patient trust is paramount. However, a problem lies in the culture that surrounds professionalism in terms of litigation and dental professionals feel pressure to possess an unattainable, infallible nature. These negative impacts need minimising. We suggest that undergraduates and continuing professional development approach professionalism with care, to foster a supportive, positive and reflective culture of professionalism.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference18 articles.

1. General Dental Council. Standards for the Dental Team. 2019. Available at https://www.gdc-uk.org/standards-guidance/standards-and-guidance/standards-for-the-dental-team (accessed December 2022).

2. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

3. Tallis R C. Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world. Clin Med (Lond) 2006; 6: 7-12.

4. Trathen A, Gallagher J E. Dental professionalism: definitions and debate. Br Dent J 2009; 206: 249-253.

5. General Dental Council. General Dental Council Patient and Public Survey 2017. 2017. Available at https://www.gdc-uk.org/docs/default-source/research/public-and-patient-2017-topline.pdf?sfvrsn=70bfcdb7_2 (accessed December 2022).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3